A theodicy for some given fact about evil is an explanation for why God would have an all‐things‐considered sufficient reason to allow that evil. The counterpart theodicy relies on a metaphysical claim about existence. We cannot know what "good" is unless there is "evil" to contrast it with. (1) Doesn't justify all kinds of evil (Do we need genocide to know what goodness is?), (2) Doesn't justify the amount of evil (Do we need so much killing/theft to know what goodness is?), (3) God can know good/evil prior to creation/evil.
"Nature of the national government requires strict system of organization" is not an assumption behind the U.S. Constitution.
Basically, the Articles of Confederation was abandoned because of the weakness perceived in the document.
Some of the weakness of the Articles of Confederation includes:
- Each states have only one congress despite large population of citizen
- No power confer on Congress to regulate foreign trade
- No court or judicial system
- No power conferred on Congress to receive tax
Hence, the statement that "nature of the national government requires strict system of organization" is not an assumption behind the U.S. Constitution.
Therefore, the Option A is correct.
Read more about Articles of Confederation
<em>brainly.com/question/24912988</em>
<span>Cultural "norms" refer to the collective expectations of what constitutes proper or improper behavior in a given interaction scene.
</span>
Cultural norms refers to the benchmarks we live by. They are the common desires and decides that guide conduct of individuals inside social gatherings. Cultural norms are found out and strengthened from guardians, companions, educators and others while experiencing childhood in a general public.
