Answer:
Maxwell will win this case, as per division 2 of UCC, seller bears the cost for loss under implied warranty of fitness, if the goods do not meet the ordinary purpose or is inefficient.
Explanation:
Given in this case, Maxwell is applying "Universal Commercial Code (UCC)" division 2 provision, which defines all the goods and services.
A movable property, which can be sold from seller to the buyer at certain prices are called goods. Therefore, in this case, "Raw Cream" comes in the definition of goods, as it is directly sold to Maxwell by the grocery shop.
Maxwell will win this case, as per division 2 of UCC, seller bears the cost for loss under implied warranty of fitness, if the goods do not meet the ordinary purpose or is inefficient.
Answer:
There is no contract since both Helen and Garth made a mutual mistake.
In contract law, a mutual mistake occurs when all the parties involved (Helen and Garth) are mistaken about important material facts that affect the contract (which ATV is being sold). The parties intend to perform but what they consider being part of the contract is not what the other party considers part of the contract. When both parties make a mutual mistake, the contract is cancelled.
Mutual mistakes are not on purpose, they are mistakes committed in good faith.
Answer:
See below
Explanation:
It is to be noted that under IFR, inventories are carried at a lower of cost or net realizable value, which is $550,000 in this scenario.
Also, under the United states GAAP, inventories are carried at a lower of cost or market . Here, the replacement cost of $525,000 would be used because it is below NRV and its equal to the difference between NRV and normal profit margin.
True, an ethics officers' role is to act as a counsellor for employees as well as an investigator for the firm.
The Ethics Officer is the company's inner or internal control point for ethical and improper conduct, allegations, objections, and improprieties, as well as providing leadership and guidance on corporate governance problems.
Learn more:
brainly.com/question/18072443?referrer=searchResults
Robert should use intermittent schedules of reinforcement to keep his employees mentally alert and interested. The procedure of learning through association to increase or decrease voluntary behavior using punishment and reinforcement is known as operant conditioning.
Reinforcement schedules are the rules that govern the timing and frequency of reinforcer delivery in order to increase the likelihood that a target behavior will occur again, strengthen, or continue. A contingency timetable is one that includes reinforcement. While intermittent schedules provide reinforcers.
After some but not all correct replies, intermittent schedules apply reinforcement after each correct response, or none at all. Reinforcers are only used after the target behavior has occurred, so reinforcement is conditional on the desired behavior.
To learn more about intermittent click here,
brainly.com/question/27612374
#SPJ4
