Answer: 1A. Confusion
1B. “Waiting for nothing, with nothing I wanted to do.”
2A. It shows that feelings of guilt will pass. It shows that it is best to admit mistakes. It shows that it is difficult to understand how other people are feeling.C.
2B. B.
3A. They both dislike quitting something before it is finished. Neither of them is good at apologizing when they are wrong. They are both unsure about what the other person will do. C.
3B. A,B
4A. D
4B. E, A
Explanation:
Answer:
Explanation:In historiography, the term historical revisionism identifies the re-interpretation of an historical account.[1] It usually involves challenging the orthodox (established, accepted or traditional) views held by professional scholars about a historical event or time-span or phenomenon, introducing contrary evidence, or reinterpreting the motivations and decisions of the people involved. The revision of the historical record can reflect new discoveries of fact, evidence, and interpretation, which then results in revised history. In dramatic cases, revisionism involves a reversal of older moral judgments.
At a basic level, legitimate historical revisionism is a common and not especially controversial process of developing and refining the writing of histories. Much more controversial is the reversal of moral findings, whereby what mainstream historians had considered (for example) positive forces are depicted as negative. Such revisionism, if challenged (especially in heated terms) by the supporters of the previous view, can become an illegitimate form of historical revisionism known as historical negationism if it involves inappropriate methods such as:
the use of forged documents or implausible distrust of genuine documents
attributing false conclusions to books and sources
manipulating statistical data
deliberately mis-translating texts
This type of historical revisionism can present a re-interpretation of the moral meaning of the historical record.[2] Negationists use the term "revisionism" to portray their efforts as legitimate historical revisionism. This is especially the case when "revisionism" relates to Holocaust denial.
<span>The party began as a single-issue party, but has grown to address other issues.
</span>
Moctezuma I was a great leader, probably the best of the Aztec rulers. He was a great military commander, but also politician and diplomat. Moctezuma I wanted to have everything under control in the empire, and also to put order in it and make a proper class system. This resulted in multiple reforms in the political, social, and economic spheres. Politically, Moctezuma I managed to form the Triple Alliance, managing to make an alliance with two other empires, sharing the land, resources, and rule, while maintaining the dominant power in it. He established himself as the absolute authority, so everyone had to notify him of everything that was considered important and he had to give permission for it to happen. Socially, he created the classes, setting up rules which people can be in what class, what kind of homes can they have, what objects they are allowed to visit, but also forbid mixing of the classes. Economically, he created aqueducts and much better developed agriculture and usage of the natural resources, while also developing the trade.
Zeus’ Roman name is Jupiter.
