Answer:
x=3
Step-by-step explanation:
3*3=9-1=8 so it is still bigger
Answer:
7.280 k
Step-by-step explanation:
Given that 1 g = 0.001 k
If he uses 520 grams of flour each day for 2 weeks, since there are 7 days in a week, the total weight of flour used in two weeks
= 520 g * 2 * 7
= 7280 g
In kilograms
Since
1 g = 0.001 k
7280 g = 7280/1 * 0.001 k
= 7.280 k
Answer:
Explained below.
Step-by-step explanation:
(11)
Subtract the sum of (13x - 4y + 7z) and (- 6z + 6x + 3y) from the sum of (6x - 4y - 4z) and (2x + 4y - 7z).
Thus, the final expression is (-11x + y - 12z).
(12)
From the sum of (x² + 3y² - 6xy), (2x² - y² + 8xy), (y² + 8) and (x² - 3xy) subtract (-3x² + 4y² - xy + x - y + 3).
Thus, the final expression is (7x² - y² - x + y + 5).
(13)
What should be subtracted from (x² – xy + y² – x + y + 3) to obtain (-x²+ 3y²- 4xy + 1)?
Thus, the expression is (2x² - 2y² + 3xy - x + y + 2).
(14)
What should be added to (xy – 3yz + 4zx) to get (4xy – 3zx + 4yz + 7)?
Thus, the expression is (3xy - 7zx + 7yz + 7).
(15)
How much is (x² − 2xy + 3y²) less than (2x² − 3y² + xy)?
Thus, the expression is (x² - 6y² + 3xy).
Answer:
- vertical scaling by a factor of 1/3 (compression)
- reflection over the y-axis
- horizontal scaling by a factor of 3 (expansion)
- translation left 1 unit
- translation up 3 units
Step-by-step explanation:
These are the transformations of interest:
g(x) = k·f(x) . . . . . vertical scaling (expansion) by a factor of k
g(x) = f(x) +k . . . . vertical translation by k units (upward)
g(x) = f(x/k) . . . . . horizontal expansion by a factor of k. When k < 0, the function is also reflected over the y-axis
g(x) = f(x-k) . . . . . horizontal translation to the right by k units
__
Here, we have ...
g(x) = 1/3f(-1/3(x+1)) +3
The vertical and horizontal transformations can be applied in either order, since neither affects the other. If we work left-to-right through the expression for g(x), we can see these transformations have been applied:
- vertical scaling by a factor of 1/3 (compression) . . . 1/3f(x)
- reflection over the y-axis . . . 1/3f(-x)
- horizontal scaling by a factor of 3 (expansion) . . . 1/3f(-1/3x)
- translation left 1 unit . . . 1/3f(-1/3(x+1))
- translation up 3 units . . . 1/3f(-1/3(x+1)) +3
_____
<em>Additional comment</em>
The "working" is a matter of matching the form of g(x) to the forms of the different transformations. It is a pattern-matching problem.
The horizontal transformations could also be described as ...
- translation right 1/3 unit . . . f(x -1/3)
- reflection over y and expansion by a factor of 3 . . . f(-1/3x -1/3)
The initial translation in this scenario would be reflected to a translation left 1/3 unit, then the horizontal expansion would turn that into a translation left 1 unit, as described above. Order matters.
You can’t really know the y value unless you’re told that they’re both directly proportional. if so, then check out the pic