Answer:
Minimize harm because the protester might be affected by the interview.
Seek truth because the protester made a statement about a major issue.
Explanation:
The SPJ Code of Ethics is a guide that encourages journalists to take responsibility for the information they provide. It is not a strict set of rules, but it's important either way because some basic principles need to be followed in sensitive cases, such as this one.
As the protester is a minor, she needs to be protected. That's why the harm should be minimized as much as it's possible. But, at the same time, there is a possibility that the mother is not telling the truth. It is understandable that she may not want her daughter to be exposed, but the truth matters. If the protester is aware of the fact her face may be on television and wants to be heard, it should be alright to air the interview. After all, she spoke about an important issue. That's why the reporter should seek the truth and then try making the right decision.
Thus, the correct options are the last two.
Answer: It’s Alan
Explanation:
Plagiarism is the act of using someone else’s ideas and pasting them off as their own. Even though someone like Karen may have forgotten to add citations, reading her essay would make it very clear that she is adding in her own ideas; she just forgot to add in the sources of which she tried to find information from. Alan didn’t do any work and tried to pass off the whole essay as his own. He did so on purpose too.
<em>Answer:</em>
<em>Answer:the practice of working from home, making use of the internet, email, and the telephone.</em>
Answer:
I think because he's been doing Halloween his whole life, doing the same exact thing over and over.
To my best of knowledge my answer is Xuanzang<span>, the main character, is a monk who is sent on a pilgrimage. At the end of his </span>journey<span>, he achieves Buddhahood, which would be described as the perfection of knowledge and wisdom. Sun Wukong, is a disciple in the form of a monkey.
Hoped I Helped!</span>