Answer: Yes the US should have gone to war. There are two sides to the topic, Yes and No. Yes because if we did not go to war with mexico we would not own all the present 50 states. No because war is expensive.
Explanation:
So for Yes you could write. The United States should have gone to war with mexico because, if they didn't then the United states would not be what it is today. A second reason is we needed the resources they had on there territory.
For no you could write. The United States should not have gone to war with mexico because, war is expensive for ammo and troops, a second reason is it was expensive for allies and reinforcements, and shipment.
Answer:
Im guessing you mean Abraham Lincoln
Explanation:
America is governed as a democracy, meaning being ruled by the people. but the first answer doesn't make sense but its the closes one i guess.
<u>Answer:</u>
Early mound-building tribes flourish "In the Mississippi and Ohio River Valleys".
<u>Explanation:</u>
"Mound Builders" is a collective name for number of North American inhabitants for a period of 5000 years and comprised from Archaic's period pre-Columbian cultures, Woodland's period Adena, Calusa and Hopewell cultures, Mississippian period cultural people from 3599 BCE to 16th century CE resided in Ohio & Mississippi River Valley.
The Mound Builders were categorized with different classes of society termed as the Nobles, the Stars, the Honored Men and the Honored Women and the lower class.The Mound Builders use to pay homage to the sun and centered their religion served by shaven priests, a shaman, and leaders of the village around a temple.
here you go
The diplomatic neutrality of the United States was tested during the Napoleonic Wars (1803-1815). The warring nations of Britain and France both imposed trade restrictions in order to weaken each other's economies. These restrictions also disrupted American trade and threatened American neutrality. As time went on, British harassment of American ships increased. Controversial measures included British impressment of American men and seizure of American goods. After the Chesapeake Affair in June 1807, pitting the British warship Leopard against the American frigate Chesapeake, President Thomas Jefferson faced a decision regarding the situation at hand. Ultimately, he chose an economic option to assert American rights: The Embargo Act of 1807.
Impressment
Although not restricted to the presidential administrations of Jefferson and James Madison, the on-going impressment of American sailors became a key issue for the United States during the Napoleonic Wars. After witnessing the horrors of war with France, many British sailors deserted His Majesty's navy and enlisted in the American merchant marines. In order to retrieve the deserters, British "press gangs" came aboard American ships. The British, however, tended to take anyone who could pass as a British soldier – unless the sailor could prove his American citizenship. Approximately 1,000, out of the estimated 10,000 men taken from American ships, were proven to have British citizenship.1
James Madison had summed up the contrasting points of view in an 1804 letter to James Monroe:
