Remark
This is a good question to mull over. What exactly are you told? Multiple choice doesn't allow you to stray much from that point. The main point is that she was illuminated from the light coming from the open door. It doesn't suggest we go hunting for what that might mean.
However the commentary does (that's your second sheet). It defines dark. It defines light and it defines blind and bland.
With this set of comments in mind, let's choose an answer.
A is likely true. But is that what we are told? The commentary hints at it, but we have not gotten into the narrator's head. Not yet. We'll come back to this if we have to.
He's not confused. Not here anyway. I wouldn't pick B.
C Maybe. That's more hinted at in the commentary than it is in the single sentence we have to work with. I would say it is too big a leap. I wouldn't choose it.
D since this is mentioned in the commentary, it can't be eliminated.
E we have no hint of this, even if it is true, which it could be.
So what are we left with?
A and D with a small nod (very small) to C.
I think I'd go with A, but I wouldn't be the least surprised if it was one of the other 2. If you feel that D is the better answer, go with it. This is a coin tossing time.
Answer:
Because they will go bad.
Explanation:
If eggs are not served immediately after cooked they will begin to grow mold and become unedible.
Answer:
Explanation:
The content and vocabulary of this response is grade level. You should try to include better transitions when mentioning certain events in "The Tempest". Lastly, your conclusion should be a symposis of what you wrote not just a claim. Expand furthmore on the deeper meaning of the abuse of power and superiority. P.S. make sure to put all citations from the text in parentheses as it would be easier for the reader to see your citation.
Since there is no description of herself i would say she dosn't exist
Answer:
The inference that is best supported by the passage is:
A. The writers of successful films learned from the plot structure outlined in Campbell's book.
Explanation:
When the author of the passage mentions movies such as "The Matrix", "Star Wars" and "Lord of the Rings", the purpose is to show how important and effective Campbell's structure is. It is not that those movies plagiarized anything. And it is not that Campbell analyzed those movies. It is just an archetypal structure, that is, a structure that can be found almost universally and that is effective precisely because it is understandable. The author does not say that a movie that does not follow that blueprint will be a failure. There are movies that do so effectively and are acclaimed for that. But, whether we like it or not, most successful movies - at least the Hollywood ones - do tend to follow that blueprint with a high degree of success.
