Explanation:
1) Famous celebrities and the people with lots of money are often seen with workers round them for their household chores/tasks. Although they are paying money for the work they could have done by themselves but if we analyze closely, they are actually taking advantage of the opportunity cost. The time when they were suppose to do the household work, now they are performing other task in that time which will be giving them much greater economic benefit, taking advantage of the concept of opportunity cost. For example, Cristiano Ronaldo can focus on his workout and daily exercise instead of making daily meals for himself, so he should have hired someone to do the meal work for him while he perform his workout which will help him on the field and will earn him much money.
2) Yes, it is possible for 2 countries to benefit from trade as a whole because they can get into an agreement by allowing free trade between the countries, for example, both the countries could agree that all the trade which will be executed between them would be tax free and no duties will be paid on them. This way the trade numbers would increase and industrialization would take place to meet the export/import orders. On the contrary, trading individually can be not so beneficial because there will be no free trade agreements between individuals i.e. no free lunches, that is why it could cost individuals much more than they can make money out of it.
3) One of the main reasons to oppose policies that restrict trade among the nations is that GDP. GDP is a measure of growth in any country, therefore when there will be no trade among countries, it would result in less productions of goods and services which which lead to less industrialization, which then will result to low employment and more unemployment, ultimately resulting in very low growth for any country and since growth is the only way forward for any nation, economists oppose policies that restrict trade among countries/nations.
I hope this detailed answer of mine help the poster.
Thank You and Good Luck.
Answer:
No penalty
Explanation:
The tax penalty is as follows
The HSA i.e. health saving account. It is opened so that the expenses related to the medical could be paid and the high health plan i.e. deductible (HDHP) would not covered here
In the case when rules are not followed so there is a penalty of 20%
Given that the amount taxable is $15,000
So here the penalty would be
= $15,000 × 20%
= $3,000
But since Marilyn age is 66 so there is no penalty as the penalty would be applied till the age of 65
Answer:
Shortage
Explanation:
I got it correct because I watched the given recording.
Answer:
Expectancy theory
Explanation:
Expectancy theory states that when an individual is faced with different choices they will be motivated in a certain way in choosing a particular option based on what they expect to be the result of the choice.
So behaviour is affected by perceived result or consequence of a particular choice.
In the given scenario Joyce works hard and puts in many extra hours, and getting a promotion is most important to Joyce.
So because of her expectations that manager must recognise that:
(1) she is putting in hard work and long hours to obtain a promotion,
(2) what motivates Joyce will change over time (if she does not get the promotion), and
(3) he must clearly show Joyce how to attain the desirable reward.
Answer:
The amount of current assets are $252,000
Explanation:
Current assets: The current assets are those assets who are converted into cash within one year. Like - accounts receivable, cash, inventory, prepaid insurance, etc.
The total amount of the current assets are shown below:
= Accounts receivable + Cash + Inventory + Short-term investments + Prepaid insurance
= $100,000 + $70,000 + $80,000 + $2,000
= $252,000
The other items represent current liabilities, long term liabilities, intangible assets, and the fixed assets so, we do not consider them in the computation part.
