The process by which aspects of life that were considered bad or deviant are redefined as sickness and needing medical attention to remedy is called <u>Medicalization.</u>
<u></u>
The process of labelling and treating symptoms and behaviors as medical problems is known as medicalization. Since medical firms have generated significant profits by classifying typical health variations as abnormal conditions, critics have dubbed this over-medicalization or disease mongering. Some of this is a result of science's explosive development during the past 30 years. For instance, despite the fact that infertility has always been a prevalent problem, the development of medical techniques and pharmaceuticals to treat it has resulted in a huge surge in the number of infertility diagnoses.
It is now a diagnosable medical ailment and a case of medicalization. Naturally, the inverse is also accurate. De-medicalization occurs when circumstances or actions that were once considered to be symptoms of sickness are now accepted as commonplace aspects of life. In the past, these behaviours were "treated" or "punished" ineffectively, but modern medicine now sees these behaviours as natural and healthy components of life.
To learn more about Medicalization here,
brainly.com/question/12881840
#SPJ4
I’m sorry I’m not doin I was gonna we eit was like that was a little wow I didn’t wanna see y’all today and I wanna see you later love y’all so I don’t have trttttt
Answer:
a. Yes, provided all of the required disclosures are made clearly
Explanation:
The SEC will allow Medicine for All to issue securities so long as full disclosure and transparency is confirmed by the SEC. This would apply or fall under disclosure requirements of the SEC and also be closely related with Regulation Fair Disclosure (Reg FD) rule passed by the Securities and Exchange Commission to mitigate selective disclosure by public companies to select groups or certain professionals and shareholders
<span>In Texas, the top executives in government are elected, rather than appointed by the governor. Thus, the accountability and continued service of these executives are determined by voters. The Texas Constitution of 1876 delegated many of the powers other governors hold to these officials. Also, the officials may not even be of the same political party as the governor. Thus, it takes compromise and persuasion for the governor of Texas to advance his policies while in office.</span>