Hey there! I'm going to use agriculture as an example. Depending on its relations with other countries, certain societies can negotiate on what they want and trade for it. Or, they could set up systems in which certain countries send over certain products. For example, The United States produces a surplus of lots of food due to technological advancements in the food industry. It sends this extra food to poor countries. Also, depending on the country's goods, it may have a higher demand and therefore send it out to many countries. Because New Zealand is far away from the top consumers Europe and North America, they cannot produce highly perishable items that will spoil on the trip over. Instead, they create products from milk that do not spoil as quickly. In the end, societies will distribute their goods depending on their relative location with its buyers. Hope this helps!
I believe the answer is: B. Say they will vote against a candidate because of the candidates race.
Answer:
Minimal Scrutiny
Explanation:
First of all, <u>Scrutiny means observation or examination,</u> and therefore minimal scrutiny means that the court will be investigating what the bus company does when they want to hire someone but <u>not in an extensive manner</u>, they will probably only search for a few documents for them to come to a quick verdict without much trouble.
Answer:
The conquering king retained the right to overrule the decisions of church courts and to hear all cases in which a layman was in conflict with the church. William personally attended the local church councils which now became more frequent. He acted as master of all they did.
William worked closely with Lanfranc, who organized the church and, using English precedents, brought the Archbishop of York under the authority of Canterbury. William preferred to deal with one church hierarchy, not two. Bishops became part of the feudal military structure.
Explanation: