Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:
1) Use FOIL method: (a + b) (c + d) = ac + ad + bc + bd.

2) Collect like terms.

3) Simplify.

<em><u>Therefor</u></em><em><u>,</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>the</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>answer</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>is</u></em><em><u> </u></em><u>x</u><u>²</u><u> </u><u>+</u><u> </u><u>9x</u><u> </u><u>+</u><u> </u><u>20</u>.
-18 because a negative number times positive is negative.
~JZ
Answer:
Do no reject null hypothesis.
Conclusion:
there is no sufficient statistical evidence at 0.025 level of significance to support the claim.
Step-by-step explanation:
Given that;
mean x" = 5.4
standard deviation σ = 0.7
n = 6
Null hypothesis H₀ : μ = 5.0
Alternative hypothesis H₁ : μ > 5.0
∝ = 0.025
now,
t = ( 5.4 - 5.0) / ( 0.7/√6) = 0.4 / 0.2857 = 1.4
degree of freedom df = n-1 = 6 - 1 = 5
T critical = 2.571
Therefore; t < T critical,
Do no reject null hypothesis.
Conclusion:
there is no sufficient statistical evidence at 0.025 level of significance to support the claim.
Answer:
=> Apply law of cosine

=> input value

=> simplify

=> calulcation

=> apply rule: Distance must be greater than 0
which is about 14.51828
Answer:
Try c am sure it is correct