<h2>Answer:
y = - ¹/₂ x OR y - 1 = - ¹/₂ (x + 2) </h2>
<h3>Step-by-step explanation: </h3>
For us to write the equation for this line, we need to (1) find the slope of the line, and (2) use one of the points to write an equation:
The question gives us two points, (-2, 1) and (-8, 4), from which we can find the slope and later the equation of the line.
<u>Finding the Slope </u>
The slope of the line (m) = (y₂ - y₁) ÷ (x₂ - x₁)
= (4 - 1) ÷ (-8 - (-2))
= - ¹/₂
<u>Finding the Equation</u>
We can now use the point-slope form (y - y₁) = m(x - x₁)) to write the equation for this line:
⇒ y - 1 = - ¹/₂ (x - (-2))
∴ y - 1 = - ¹/₂ (x + 2)
we could also transform this into the slope-intercept form ( y = mx + c)
since y - 1 = - ¹/₂ (x + 2)
⇒ y = - ¹/₂ x
<em>To test my answer, I have included a Desmos Graph that I graphed using the information provided in the question and my answer.</em>
Answer:
SSS is the congruence theorem that can be used to prove Δ LON is congruent to Δ LMN ⇒ 1st answer
Step-by-step explanation:
Let us revise the cases of congruence
- SSS ⇒ 3 sides in the 1st Δ ≅ 3 sides in the 2nd Δ
- SAS ⇒ 2 sides and including angle in the 1st Δ ≅ 2 sides and including angle in the 2nd Δ
- ASA ⇒ 2 angles and the side whose joining them in the 1st Δ ≅ 2 angles and the side whose joining them in the 2nd Δ
- AAS ⇒ 2 angles and one side in the 1st Δ ≅ 2 angles and one side in the 2nd Δ
- HL ⇒ hypotenuse leg of the 1st right Δ ≅ hypotenuse leg of the 2nd right Δ
In triangles LON and LMN
∵ LO ≅ LM ⇒ given
∵ NO ≅ NM ⇒ given
∵ LN is a common side in the two triangles
- That means the 3 sides of Δ LON are congruent to the 3 sides
of Δ LMN
∴ Δ LON ≅ LMN ⇒ by using SSS theorem of congruence
SSS is the congruence theorem that can be used to prove Δ LON is congruent to Δ LMN
Answer:
It is A
Step-by-step explanation:
Your welcome
Let me know if you ever need help! :)
He would be spending less time because 2/3 is not a full number. Let's make an equation out of the: 2/3(m). Note: 3(2) means 3 times 2 and the m is the amount of miles biked last week. We could insert the number 3 to our equation. 2/3(3). Now if you do it the proper way, it is 2/3(3/1) and if you do the math it is 6/3 aka 2. And 2 is less than 3. So it is less time spent
Answer: B) there is not enough information to tell since they are not between parallel planes
Step-by-step explanation:
