I think it would be 2 soulutions
We can re-write the equation √(1-x) - 2y = 2 → - 2y = 2 - √(1-x)
→ 2y = - 2 + √(1-x) → and y = [ - 2 + √(1+x)]/2
Tis function "exists" as long as the radical is > or = to zero:
1+x > or = 0 → x>-1
{x ∈ R for x> =0}
Answer:
53 articles? Because josh wrote 13 plus 20 that Paulette wrote then Jeff wrote as many as Paulette so another 20.
Answer:
11
Step-by-step explanation:
4=1
14=2
24=3
34=4
40=5
41=6
42=7
43=8
44=9
45=10
46=11
You will encounter 11 4s.