Answer:
sell 1.714
Explanation:
The computation of the number of contract buy or sold to hedge the position is shown below:
As we know that
Number of contracts = Hedge Ratio
Hedge Ratio = Change in Portfolio Value ÷ Profit on one future contract
where,
Change in the value of the portfolio is
For that we need to do following calculations
Expected Drop in Index is
= (1200 - 1400) ÷ 1400
= -14.29%
And, Expected Loss on the portfolio is
= Beta × Expected index drop
= 0.60 × (-14.29%)
= -8.57%
So, the change is
= 1000000 × (-8.57%)
= -$85,700
And, the profit is
= 200 × 250 multiplier
= 50,000
So, the hedging position is
= -$85,700 ÷ 50,000
= -1.714
This reflects the selling position
Answer:
C. Spencer will win because regardless of whether Glen was acting within the scope of his employment, Sally is liable for his negligence
Explanation:
Spencer will win the lawsuit and Sally is liable for negligence.
This is because, Sally was the person originally hired to do the roofing job.
She hired other workers to help her with the job, so she's liable to their actions and inactions.
Sally is operating under a working agreement (contract) and has already charged a fee of $10,000 so any punitive damages would be her responsibility.
Spencer was moving around and Glen threw some roofing shingles without any word of warning to people that might be in harm's way. So for Glenn's actions, Sally is liable for his negligence.
Answer:
A) Analogous Estimation
Explanation:
Analogous Estimation is the process of comparing past costs and expenses of projects to make estimations for the current projects. This is usually used when there is data limitation for accurate estimations on the current projects.
Parametric is where a unit rate is devised to calculate project costs comprising of several units.
Bottom up estimation deals with estimating smaller cost components and then using the sum of these components to make larger estimates.
Option D is based on rough estimates on the time and effort required for a project.
None of the other options thus take into account past work other than the analogous estimation technique.
Hope that helps.
Answer:
a) true
Explanation:
This is true because, increasing the price of the product sold by an organisation directly lead to the reduction of the operating cost of the said organization, all other things being equal. <em>For example, a glass manufacturing company increasing the selling price per unit glass from $40 to $90 will definitely lead to operating cost reduction.</em>
<span>When the economist says that material wants are insatiable, he means that these wants are virtually unlimited and therefore incapable of complete satisfaction. Insatiable means that they are impossibly to satisfy. In the economic world it is best to make use of the limited resources to help satisfy virtually unlimited wants. </span>
