The correct answer is: " √x − <span>2√b " .
</span>_________________________________________________________
The "conjugate" of " √x + 2√b " is: " √x − 2√b " .
_________________________________________________________
Explanation:
_________________________________________________________
In an expression with 2 (TWO) terms; that is, in a "binomial expression",
the "conjugate" of that expression refers to that very expression — with the "sign" in between those two terms—"reverse" (e.g. "minus" becomes "plus" ; or, "plus" becomes "minus" .) .
_________________________________________________________
→ So: We are given: " <span>√x + 2√b " .
</span>
→ Note that this is a "binomial expression" ;
→ that is, there are 2 (TWO) terms: " <span>√x " ; and: " 2√b " .
_________________________________________________________
To find the "conjugate" of the given binomial expression:
</span>→ " <span>√x + 2√b " ;
</span>→ We simply change the "+" {plus sign} to a "<span>−" {minus sign} ; and rewrite:
___________________________________________________________
</span>→ " √x − 2√b " ;
→ which is the "conjugate" ; and is the correct answer:
___________________________________________________________
→ " √x − 2√b " ; is the "conjugate" of the expression: " <span>√x + 2√b " .
___________________________________________________________
</span>→ {that is: " √x − 2√b " ; is the conjugate.}.
___________________________________________________________
The first false statement in the proof as it stands is in Line 5, where it is claimed that a line of length 2.83 is congruent to a line of length 4.47. This mistake cannot be corrected by adding lines to the proof.
_____
The first erroneous tactical move is in Line 4, where the length of DE is computed, rather than the length of FD. This mistake can be corrected by adding lines to the proof.
A correct SAS proof would use segment FD in Line 4, so it could be argued that the first mistake is there.
You just add all the sides together for perimeter
the answer is105
Answer: They are not inverse.
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer: 21:84
Explanation:
84-63=21, and then just do 21:84 lol
