No the freedom of a group of people should not cause the other set of people to have less freedom.
<h3>What is the declaration of independence?</h3>
This is the article that talked about the reason why the colonists wanted to be away from the leadership of the English people in the colonies. It talked about the issues that the people faced in the hands of Britain.
Freedom is supposed to be the universal right of all the people of the world but there are times that situations may exists that may cause some people to act like they are superior than other people.
For instance was during the colonial days, and the days that there was slavery in the United States.
The conclusion is that No the freedom of a group of people should not cause the other set of people to have less freedom.
Read more on the declaration of independence here:
brainly.com/question/9515546
#SPJ1
Answer:
Lafayette might have seen the extent to which slavery was practiced.
Explanation:
Marquis de Lafayette was a French military officer who commanded American troops during the America Revolutionary War, and returned back to France after the war.
On the invitation of President James Monroe and the United States Congress, Lafayette came back to the United States in 1824 to celebrate its upcoming 50th anniversary. During his visit, he was dissatisfied and disappointed when he found out that slavery existed in the parts of America that he visited; sights of slavery would have impelled him to make the statement.
Answer: He was honored to serve his country in the defense for the trial and completely agreed with the verdict. He was disappointed to have to defend the British soldiers and disagreed with the verdict.
Explanation:
(d) A former slave who led the Haitian rebellion
