Answer: Gambler's fallacy
Explanations: Gambler's fallacy can be simply defined as a phenomenon where the outcome of an event is viewed as less or more likely due to the outcome of previous events even though each event is independent.
For example, If a family should give birth to (5) five boys, gambler's fallacy will argue that the chance or probability of the family giving birth to girl next higher because the previous ones were boys, but in reality the chances are thesame because both gender has equally chance of being conceived.
So Miranda’s statement is a good example of gambler's fallacy because she argue that the probability that she will toss a tail in her sixth toss is higher than 50% and in reality, the probability of tossing a head or a tail are both thesame i.e 50%.
Thank you for posting your question here at brainly. I hope the answer will help you. Feel free to ask more questions.
The statement "<span>In order to better respond to international conflicts, the united states should significantly increase its military spending." is true</span>
Answer:
In some situations, don't go outside, stay indoors and take shelter. Seek help and assistance if needed.
The United States affairs stayed the same in the WW2 because it remained neutral because it was not economically or militarily prepared to fight in a war.
<h3>What was the World War 2?</h3>
It was the global war that lasted from 1939 to 1945 between two military alliances named the Allied Powers and the Axis Powers.
During the war, the United States maintained a neutrality foreign policy and this made it stayed the same in the WW2 as it was not economically or militarily prepared to fight in a war.
Read more about neutrality foreign policy
brainly.com/question/20705249
#SPJ1
Locke's Second Treatise on Civil Government.
Locke quarreled for the belief that the individuals are conclusively the reference of powers in supervising, Thus the individual also has the freedom to dismount a party that is not suitably accepting the nation's people. John Locke was discussing the concept of a "social contract." According to his opinion, a government's capability to administer by the permission of the people. This was a transition from the unfounded beliefs of "divine right monarchy" that a king governed because Lord designated him to be the leader. Locke discarded the acceptance of the spiritual right government in his First Treatise on Civil Government. In his Second Treatise on Civil Government, Locke contended for the benefits of the people to organize their ministries according to their wishes and to protect their personal life, education, and resources.
