Answer:
Here we will use algebra to find three consecutive integers whose sum is 300. We start by assigning X to the first integer. Since they are consecutive, it means that the 2nd number will be X + 1 and the 3rd number will be X + 2 and they should all add up to 300. Therefore, you can write the equation as follows:
(X) + (X + 1) + (X + 2) = 300
To solve for X, you first add the integers together and the X variables together. Then you subtract three from each side, followed by dividing by 3 on each side. Here is the work to show our math:
X + X + 1 + X + 2 = 300
3X + 3 = 300
3X + 3 - 3 = 300 - 3
3X = 297
3X/3 = 297/3
X = 99
Which means that the first number is 99, the second number is 99 + 1 and the third number is 99 + 2. Therefore, three consecutive integers that add up to 300 are 99, 100, and 101.
99 + 100 + 101 = 300
We know our answer is correct because 99 + 100 + 101 equals 300 as displayed above.
Step-by-step explanation:
Step-by-step explanation:
the number would be heading towards the -11 because it's to negatives adding together and it's adding them up but as a negative so it u just had 6+5 it equals 11 but u just put the negative
The value of 5 in the ten-thousands place is 10 times greater than the value of 5 in the thousands place.
You can also say that the value of 5 in the thousands place is 10 times less than the value of 5 in the ten-thousands place.
The answer is d because the perimeter of 6 by 6 would be 24 and that is the smallest perimeter.
By graph of object A the rate of change is estimated at 17/6.
Object B's rate of change is 10/3=20/6.
Comparing object A to object B:
17/6 <20/6
Object B is faster by:
17/6x=20/6
(6/17)(17/6)x=(20/6)(6/17)
x=20/17≈1.18
B)
Object B by a factor of 1.19
Since I made an estimation from graph of object A , my solution is off by. 01 but it is the closest I can get. The solution B is correct.
