Answer:
D. Kailey is not correct: 
is not written in scientific notation.
Step-by-step explanation:
We have been given that Kailey wrote 8,912,000 in scientific notation as . We are asked to choose the statement that best describes Kailey's work.
We know that to convert a number into scientific notation, we write the given number as product of two numbers. One factor is a number between 1 and 10, while the 2nd factor is power of 10.
Upon looking at , we can see that 1st factor is 89.10, which is greater than 10. This means that Kailey did not write 8,912,000 in scientific notation.
Therefore, option D is correct choice.
The way to solve this question is to essentially reverse the equation I used in the other answer.
I would solve this with some theoretical values. If you start with 3, how long would it take for it to triple, or reach 9.
the equation would look like 9 = 3(2)^t/6, note how the instead of 1/2 it is now 2 in the parenthesis, as it doubles every 6 hours rather than halves every amount of hours.
When placed into an algebra calculator, the answer should be about 9.5 hours
So 5 red cars
1/3 of all cars are red
therefor
5=1/3 of all cars
'of' means multply
5=1/3 times all cars
multiply both sides by 3
15=all cars
how many are left
basically how many are NOT red
15=all
red=5
all-red=others
15-5=others=10
10 cars are left
Answer:
193.08
Step-by-step explanation:
Your Welcome :D
Can i have brainlest
