The U.S. Supreme Court hands down its decision on Sanford v. Dred Scott, a case that intensified national divisions over the issue of slavery.
In 1834, Dred Scott, a slave, had been taken to Illinois, a free state, and then Wisconsin territory, where the Missouri Compromise of 1820 prohibited slavery. Scott lived in Wisconsin with his master, Dr. John Emerson, for several years before returning to Missouri, a slave state. In 1846, after Emerson died, Scott sued his master’s widow for his freedom on the grounds that he had lived as a resident of a free state and territory. He won his suit in a lower court, but the Missouri supreme court reversed the decision. Scott appealed the decision, and as his new master, J.F.A. Sanford, was a resident of New York, a federal court decided to hear the case on the basis of the diversity of state citizenship represented. After a federal district court decided against Scott, the case came on appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court, which was divided along slavery and antislavery lines; although the Southern justices had a majority.
During the trial, the antislavery justices used the case to defend the constitutionality of the Missouri Compromise, which had been repealed by the Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854. The Southern majority responded by ruling on March 6, 1857, that the Missouri Compromise was unconstitutional and that Congress had no power to prohibit slavery in the territories. Three of the Southern justices also held that African Americans who were slaves or whose ancestors were slaves were not entitled to the rights of a federal citizen and therefore had no standing in court. These rulings all confirmed that, in the view of the nation’s highest court, under no condition did Dred Scott have the legal right to request his freedom. The Supreme Court’s verdict further inflamed the irrepressible differences in America over the issue of slavery, which in 1861 erupted with the outbreak of the American Civil War.
The name of the biggest University system in Honduras is called <span>Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Honduras. The main difference between Puerto Rican Graduation ceremony and a United States graduation ceremony is that the language spoken in Puerto Rico is Spanish vs US which is English.</span><span />
Answer:
The correct answer is - introjection.
Explanation:
The rule of introjection could be clarified as a demonstration of hardheaded appropriation of others' thoughts. In the setting above, Maggie isn't being constrained by the educator to do her task which could have been viewed as a projection, yet Maggie does her task resolutely without being constrained in light of the arrangement she feels for her instructor.
The guideline of introjection, as a rule, bring about the improvement t of disguised inspiration because of the perception and arrangement being created with an outer power, In the setting over, the outside power is Maggie's instructor.
The amount of times that a typical person in the united states brush his or her teeth each day is measured in the :
C. Ones
Brushing your teeth too often will destroy the composition of your teeth
hope this helps
Securities traded on the midwest (Chicago) stock exchange are not exempt from the Registration requirement of the uniform securities act.
Terms used in this sentence D; The Uniform Securities Act exempts industrial loan association issues. insurance company questions; federal credit union issues; banking, savings, and loans (among others).
The act includes securities issued by Savings and Loans. Municipal bonds, including corporate income bonds. Securities of publicly traded companies (“good company” exceptions).
Certain types of securities traded and certain transactions are considered exempt from registration requirements by the SEC. Tax-Exempt Securities - Common types of tax-exempt securities include government bonds, bank securities, high-grade bonds, not-for-profit securities, and insurance policies.
Learn more about Securities traded at
brainly.com/question/25572872
#SPJ4
