Answer: Yes
Explanation: In the above case, a quasi-contract was formed. This is when a bilateral contract is not in place but one party will enjoy the benefit of the activities of the other party and may be enriched by it.
A bilateral agreement is the exchange of a promise for another and in this case would have been, the promise that Dozier would pay for Paschall’s work. This was not established, however, Dozier will benefit from Paschall’s work unduly if he does not pay for the improvements. The law holds that he has to pay for Paschall’s work to prevent being unjustly enriched.
Shareholders of public companies need to appoint a board of directors to represent their interests because of the separation of ownership and control.
Today's board members are supposed to reflect a variety of independent viewpoints. Strategic monitoring and planning are the major responsibilities of a board of directors. Even though these phrases are frequently used, it's crucial to remember that these tasks constitute the foundation of effective company planning.
A board of directors serves much more than just as the organization's public face. When selecting new board members to fill open positions, boards often seek for specific traits. Board members anticipate that their other directors will be open to challenging and in-depth questioning that seek to examine all sides of an issue. Board members must be thoroughly informed about any significant issues that have an impact on the company. Because risks are multiplying and getting more complicated, identifying risks has become an essential component of the board job.
Learn more about Board of directors here brainly.com/question/16342939
#SPJ4
Answer:
Option B
Explanation:
Both Nadia and Samantha have insured their cars and willing to pay $100 over the expected loss for insurance. If the car is stolen the company would pay expected loss and would earn nothing and if the car is not stolen the company would not be liable for any loss and would earn $200, Therefore the company would earn between $0 and $200.
Answer: Please see the required journals below:
December 31:
Debit Bad debt expense $6,034
Credit Allowance for doubtful accounts $6,034
February 1:
Debit Allowance for doubtful accounts $431
Credit Accounts receivables $431
June 5:
Debit Cash $431
Credit Bad debt recovery (income statement) $431
Explanation: The company estimates its bad debt expense as percentage of sales. In this case 0.7% of its annual sales of $862,000 was deemed as uncollectible, that is, 0.7% x $862,000 = $6,034. The required journals to recognize this bad debt expense is provided above. However, since there was an existing provision, which resides in the allowance account, a write-off would definitely hit that account in order to extinguish the accounts receivable portion. Upon recovery of the write-off, we cannot reinstate the receivable since it was already extinguished but we need to recognize the recovery as a gain.
Answer:
becauase if you dont then, if that problem ever continues again and you are for some reason not there that day then, your boss would need to know how to fix it
Explanation:
