1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
gayaneshka [121]
2 years ago
13

Find the circumference Please help

History
2 answers:
natali 33 [55]2 years ago
6 0

Answer:

area = 147 cm²

circumference = 42 cm

Explanation:

area of a circle = \pi r²

  • \pi is 3
  • r is 7 cm

area = 3 × 7²

= 49 × 3

<u>= 147 cm²</u>

circumference of a circle = 2 \pi r

circumference = 2 × 3 × 7

<u>= 42 cm</u>

rewona [7]2 years ago
4 0
147 is the circumference.

since the directions say to use 3 as pi, and we know that the radius is 7, we can say that

3 times 7^2 = A, which is 147
You might be interested in
What does it mean for a country to be a “world leader”? How might a country become a world leader?
dangina [55]

Answer:

THE COUNTRY SHOULD BE GOOD ENOUGH AND SET AN EXAMPLE FOR THE OTHER COUNTRIES..

THEN THEY WILL BE LIKE A LEADER FOR THE OTHER COUNTRIES

FOR QUESTION 2

Roosevelt described his style of foreign policy as "the exercise of intelligent forethought and of decisive action sufficiently far in advance of any likely crisis." As practiced by Roosevelt, big stick diplomacy had five components. First it was essential to possess serious military capability that would force the adversary to pay close attention. At the time that meant a world-class navy. Roosevelt never had a large army at his disposal. The other qualities were to act justly toward other nations, never to bluff, to strike only when prepared to strike hard, and the willingness to allow the adversary to save face in defeat.

The idea is negotiating peacefully but also having strength in case things go wrong. Simultaneously threatening with the "big stick", or the military, ties in heavily with the idea of Realpolitik, which implies a pursuit of political power that resembles Machiavellian ideals.It is comparable to gunboat diplomacy, as used in international politics by the powers.

Explanation:

HOPE I HELPED

PLS MARK BRAINLIEST

DESPERATELY TRYING TO LEVEL UP

                    ✌ -ZYLYNN JADE ARDENNE

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why didn't the Chinese succeed with the fifth modernization democracy?
Serhud [2]
It failed because China is a land of the proletariat and the ruling party is a communist one while the fifth modernization was about introducing democracy. Since the party represents the working class and the will of the people in theory, democracy is against it since it would enable those who are against the party to also compete which would in theory mean that they are against the people.
7 0
3 years ago
Did the kansas nebraska act cause the democratic party to break up or were they already broken before and the act was helping th
s2008m [1.1K]
<span>The Independent Democrats and many northern Whigs abandoned their affiliations for the new antislavery Republican party, leaving southern Whigs without party links and creating an issue over which the already deeply divided Democrats would split even more.</span>
5 0
3 years ago
do you think the positive effects of the columbian exchange outweighed its negative effect? explain your answer.
Ksju [112]

Answer:

No

Explanation:

My explanation is that they brought many diseases with them from Africa and Spain and that alone killed many native Americans by millions and they also had them overworked and beatin which killed them off too, also they were killed and used to work in mines and they were to convert to Catholicism or be killed. There were barely any good effects like the exchange of goods and introduction to things like horses and potatoes.

hopefully this helps you and if it does mark brainlest pls it really helps. ;)

4 0
3 years ago
Plllllllllllsssss someone HELLLLLPPPP... Its very urgent
Troyanec [42]

Answer:

The North American Free Trade Agreement created the world's largest free trade area, covering the United States, Canada, and Mexico. In 2017, its member economies generated approximately $22.2 trillion in gross domestic product. NAFTA is also controversial. Politicians don't agree on whether the free trade agreement's advantages outweigh its disadvantages. Here they are so you can decide for yourself.

Pros

NAFTA has six main advantages. According to a Congressional Research Service report prepared in 2017, the act has more than tripled trade between Canada, Mexico, and the United States since it was enacted.1  The agreement reduced and eliminated tariffs. Second, greater trade increased economic output. While it is challenging to weigh the impact of NAFTA given the variety of factors involved, experts estimated that full NAFTA implementation would U.S. growth by as much as 0.5% a year.2  Third, while there are varying estimates, stronger growth created jobs. According to a 2010 report, U.S. free trade agreements – the lion's share of which stemmed from the NAFTA agreement – directly supported 5.4 million jobs, while trade with these countries supported 17.7 million.3   Fourth, foreign direct investment (FDI) more than tripled. The United States increased FDI in Mexico from $15.2 billion in 1993 to $104.4 billion in 2012, and from $69.9 billion in Canada in 1993 to $352.9 billion in 2015. Mexico ramped up investment in the United States by 1283% over the same time period, while Canada's FDI increased by 911%. Fifth, NAFTA lowered prices. U.S. oil imports from Mexico cost less because NAFTA got rid of tariffs. That reduces America's reliance on oil from the Middle East. Low-cost oil reduces gas prices, which reduces transportation cost. Food prices are lower in turn. 4  Sixth, the agreement helped with government spending. Each nation's government contracts became available to suppliers in all three member countries. That increased competition and lowered costs.

Cons

NAFTA has six main disadvantages. First, certain estimates indicate that it led to job losses. A 2011 report from the Economic Policy Institute estimated a loss of 682,900 jobs.5  Other estimates estimate a loss of 500,000-750,000 U.S. jobs. Most were in the manufacturing industries in California, New York, Michigan, and Texas. Though the estimated job gains exceed those lost, certain industries were particularly impacted, including manufacturing, automotive, textile, computer, and electrical appliance industries. Second, job migration suppressed wages. Companies threatened to move to Mexico to keep workers from joining unions.6  Without the unions, workers could not bargain for better wages. This strategy was so successful that it became standard operating procedure. Between 1993 and 1995, half of all companies used it. By 1999, that rate had grown to 65%. Third, NAFTA put Mexican farmers out of business. It allowed U.S. government-subsidized farm products into Mexico. Local farmers could not compete with the subsidized prices. As a result, 1.3 million farmers were put out of business, according to the Economic Policy Institute.7  It forced unemployed farmers to cross the border illegally to find work. In 1995, there were 2.9 million Mexicans living in the United States illegally. It increased to 4.5 million in 2000, probably due to NAFTA.8  The recession drove that figure to 6.9 million in 2007. In 2014, it fell to 5.8 million, roughly double where it was before NAFTA. Fourth, unemployed Mexican farmers went to work in substandard conditions in the maquiladora program. Maquiladora is where United States-owned companies employ Mexican workers near the border. They cheaply assemble products for export back into the United States. Employment in maquiladoras rose 120,000 in 1980 to 1.2 million in 2006.9   Fifth, U.S. companies degraded the Mexican environment to keep costs low. Agribusiness in Mexico used more fertilizers and other chemicals, resulting in increased pollution.10  Rural farmers were forced into marginal land to stay in business, resulting in increased deforestation rates.11  That deforestation contributes to global warming. Sixth, NAFTA allowed Mexican trucks access into the United States. Mexican trucks are not held to the same safety standards as American trucks. Congress never allowed this provision to go into effect.

USMCA

Despite these advantages, the United States, Mexico, and Canada renegotiated NAFTA on September 30, 2018. The new deal is called the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement. It must be ratified by each country's legislature. Trump has called for Congress to ratify it within six months.14  If not ratified, it the U.S. will revert to pre-NAFTA trade conditions. If ratified, it will go into effect in 2020. The Trump administration renegotiated with the aim of lowering the trade deficit between the United States and Mexico.15  The new deal changes NAFTA in six major areas.16  

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What effect did the revolution in central and South America have on the social structure of South America?
    13·1 answer
  • Which historical event best fits the theme of "the defense of individual liberty"? A.In 1863, the U.S. government started a prog
    14·2 answers
  • What role did trade play in Arab civilization
    9·2 answers
  • How did nationalism affect Britain in WW1
    15·1 answer
  • How did Muhammad's teachings bring tribes together in Arabia?
    9·1 answer
  • HISTORY FORM: 3 TIME 1 HOUR OBJECTIVE TEST NAME INDEX NO.: Each question is followed by four (4) options le tered A-D Find the c
    14·1 answer
  • [HELP ASAP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!] how did land help Industrial Revolution!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    11·1 answer
  • True Or False? Rocks tend to weather fastest in warm, dry climates.
    13·1 answer
  • After the Spanish-AMerican War, a controversy arose over winteater the
    14·1 answer
  • What concern did Romans have about Julius Caesar? Plebeians were worried that Caesar would take away their land. Senators were w
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!