Answer:
<u>(2) development of unified resistance movements among the Native Americans</u>
Explanation:
Because of the European way of using the land and limited food sources, mass migration to North America created tension between the invaders and the natives. Canadian historian Jan K. Style explains that there were 30,000 Narragansett in Massachusetts in the 17th century. Their chief , "sensing danger ... sought to expand his alliance with the Mohicans to create a general Indian resistance movement.
His efforts to form a united Native American front have failed. In 1643, in a tribal war, he was captured by the chief of the Mohegan tribe, who handed him over to the English as a rebel.
This illustrates not only the ongoing clashes between the invading colonists and the indigenous population, but also the murderous rivalry and treachery among the tribes, which existed even before the white man arrived in North America at all. The British, in their wars against the French for colonial domination of North America, had some tribes on their side, while others supported the French. No matter which side lost, all the tribes involved paid a losing price.
It helped bring about a cultural change
Answer:
No, a new state law overrules a federal law is not permitted. According to the constitution the law made under the authority of the United States , shall be the supreme law of the land. As a result of this all federal laws overrules the state laws, judges in every state are bound by the federal laws irrespective of what the state laws state. The federal government can pass laws that affect every state, state government obey treaties signed by the federal government and any new federal law will force the state to change Its existing laws.
Explanation:
nope thats why the convo was made in the 1st place
