Answer:
$4,085,000
Explanation:
Given that,
Coronado Industries, issued for $103 per share, 95000 shares of $100 par value convertible preferred stock.
1 share of preferred stock = 3 shares of common stock ($20 par value)
Additional paid in capital:
= Preferred stock - Common stock
= [95,000 shares × $103] - [(95,000 shares × 3 shares) × $20]
= $9,785,000 - (285,000 shares × $20)
= $9,785,000 - $5,700,000
= $4,085,000
Answer:
He should pay his debt off, weather it is the credit card and bills, or student loan. Also he should put $50 into the emergency funds.
Explanation:
This is the best idea, why? Well, the bills and debt should come first, way before a vacation and before a new car where possible. If you chip away at your debt, and pay on time, your credit score will increase. Now, this is great because you are paying off owed money and paying bills ahead off time and on time, also your credit increases! Without good credit, you can`t get a loan for a CAR or a HOUSE! So if his credit is bad or meh, he might not get approved, therefore, he can get the car! Now emergency funds come rights after bills and debt. He has a measly $250 dollars. Now just put $50 dollars each month, you will be good. This is great because you are steadily increasing your savings by $50 each month which adds up fast without eating up money. These are the *MOST IMPORTANT* options and the smartest options. After all of this, then you could take a cheap vacation, but you have to pay bills and debt on time!
Answer:
d i think
Explanation:
since she cares about the enviroment
Brainlest?
Answer: See explanation
Explanation:
The formula to use here will be:
required rate = risk free rate + beta × (market return - risk free rate).
where,
risk free rate = 5%
beta =0.20.
market return = -30%.
Therefore,
required return = 5% + 0.20 × (-30% + -5%)
= 5% + 0.2(-35%)
= 5% - 7%
= -2%
Therefore, the return on portfolio should have been -2% but the portfolio manager produced a return of −10%
Since -10% is lower than -2%, we can deduce that the claim of the manager is wrong.
The correct answer should be that <span>the total surplus increases but by less than the amount of the tax. This happens if the tax is not larger than the producer surplus in which case it would negate and the total would not grow at all. This doesn't happen however since imposing such higher taxes is impossible and riots would surely happen.</span>