We need to notice that SSSS does not exist as a method to prove that parallelograms are congruent
Counterexample
As we can see we have the same measure of the side of the intern angles of the figures are different therefore we can't use SSSS to prove congruence
Answer:
X= 140
Step-by-step explanation:
f(x) = x3 – 4x² - 6x – 32 at x = 6
(6)(6)(6) -4²=72
-6(6)-32= -68
72+68=140
<span>Well 68/80 as a percent is 85 % .I got that by dividing 68 by 80 and them multiplying by 100. 100-85= 15. So therefore the dress decreased in price by 15%. </span>
Answer:
c
Step-by-step explanation:
First off, we know that (g ° f)(2) is just both functions done in a ordered fashion. In this case, f(x) is done first.
To figure out what f(2) is, all we have to do is find where x = 2 is on the graph. In this case it is on point (2, 3). The input is the x and the output is the y, so f(2) = 3.
Then, we can figure out what g(3) by locating x = 3 on line g. It shows the point (3, 0). This means that g(3) = 0.
Answer:
5
Step-by-step explanation:
.05 ×100=5 per cent
a nickel is 5 cent
