The correct answer is D because we can see that they affect both classes.
C. They summarize conclusions about primary sources would be the best option, because these sources differ from primary sources in that they are not first-hand accounts.
The answer is "operant conditoning".
Operant conditioning is a technique for discovering that happens through prizes and disciplines for conduct. Through operant conditioning , an individual makes a relationship between a specific conduct and an outcome.
Operant conditioning depends on a genuinely basic preface - activities that are trailed by fortification will be reinforced and more inclined to happen again later on. In the event that you recount an entertaining story in class and everyone snickers, you will presumably probably recount that story again later on.
Article III, Section II, US Constitution:
The trial of all wrongdoings, aside from in instances of impeachment, will be by jury; and such preliminary will be held in the state where the said wrongdoings will have been submitted; yet when not conferred inside any express, the preliminary will be at such place or places as the Congress may by law have directed
Answer:
Goals, methods, and styles of inquiry.
Explanation:
By establishing a comparison between the cultural directions that both law and psychology take, it is easier to figure out the reasons why, on some occasions, psychology and law have not been able to work together, whereas in some others, have been very productive in collaborating. These cultural differences take place because of their different goals, methods, and styles of inquiry.
