Option B, would be the best answer :)
Because they were better (still editing)
"I understand your concerns, but i've had both the accountants and lawyers look at this and they don't see anything wrong here so just do it" is best an example of Dogmatism Philosophy .
According the dogmatism philosophy everything that is asserted or denied must be submitted to rational inquiry that seeks to establish it with certitude or probability.
Answer and Explanation:
Teenagers should be allowed to drive from 18 years of age. This is because driving is an act of extreme responsibility, where the driver must be agile and must know how to make correct decisions in a serious and rational way. It is very difficult for young people under the age of 18 to have this degree of maturity, and it is favorable for them to avoid driving during this period. However, driving permits for 18-year-olds must have restrictions, such as having a high cognitive and psychological quality, not presenting criminal passages and strictly following traffic laws.
Regarding the most effective research questions for this prompt, those that are most appropriate are:
- Which laws are already in place that have restrictions for teenage drivers?
- Why are some people for or against raising the minimum driving age?
-
What do the data on accidents related to teen drivers reveal?
