The answer is a desirable outcome. In an approach-approach, the individual is faced with the necessity of making a choice between two (or more) desirable goals. Since both goals are desirable, this is the least worrying situation. "Shall I fly or take a boat to Europe?" might be easily determined if both means of travel are seen as pleasurable. Such situations produce a state of unstable equilibrium. As soon as one goal is approached, its desirability increases and completely dominates, thereby making the choice easy. The choice becomes easier the closer one moves toward either goal. Another example is when a person pick between two attractive and practicable careers, may lead to some indecisiveness but rarely to great distress. A person chooses the most convenient goal that results to a desirable outcome.
I would help, But I can't read the words. Sorry :-(
Answer:
Yes, Canada is a nation of both peacekeepers and peacemakers.
No, peacekeeping is not a myth.
Explanation:
Peacekeepers country often put itself in a position as mediators between other countries that interacted with one another. Canada has done this several times throughout history (one small example would be when Canada mediate a conflict of imports quota between United States and Mexico).
On top of that, Canada also involved in several peacemakers mission when they sent their resources to help the people who are trapped within political conflicts. (one example of this would be when Canada sent help to Cambodia during four peace support missions from 1954 to 2000.)
\
From those historical events alone, I believe Canada could be considered as a nation of both peacekeepers and peacemakers.