The way the author unfolds a series of events allows the creation of a logical sequence, which allows the reader to understand where the idea of climbing Mount Everest came from, the difficulties, conflicts, and resolution of this idea.
In other words, the events create a sequence that allows the book plot to advance.
Regarding "The Final Assault" we can say that:
- The book portrays the dangers and emotions of climbing Mount Everest.
- The narrator shows the apprehension of climbing the hill from the moment the idea emerged.
- However, the narrator is excited and with a strong expectation of being successful.
- After that, a series of events takes place, giving movement to the plot and showing all the consequences of this idea.
- This creates a logical sequence, which shows how events are organized until the end of the book, being able to trigger different emotions in the reader.
With this, we can conclude that the presentation of events in a sequence is a way to show linearity in the story, allow the plot to advance, and control the readers' emotions.
More information:
brainly.com/question/6110309
The correct option is option D ("Read the results section before you read the discussion section").
Taking a look at the results before you read the discussion section will allow you to form your own interpretation after analysing the content of the article <u>without being biased by what the author's conclusion was in light of the results</u>.
Here's my interpretatin of why the other options are wrong:
A) You should always start with the introduction and never with the abstract. <u>If you first read the abstract, you run the risk of becoming biased towards the author's perspective from the get go</u>.
B) & C) The discussion and conclusion sections should always be the last thing you read. <u>You need to understand the whole article by yourself and generate your own interpretation to be able to contrast it with the author's conclusion and other points of view expressed in the discussion</u>.
Hope this helps!
Mandatory, and long those are the two adjectives to describe Puritan church services
Hi There!!!!!
The Answer is > A) A person can always change, no matter what mistakes he has in his past .
Hope Thks Helps Please mark me Brainliest:)
