1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
My name is Ann [436]
3 years ago
14

Evaluate the function f(x)=6x-1

Mathematics
1 answer:
Ira Lisetskai [31]3 years ago
8 0

try 6x-1....lemme know if it right or wrong... there is a sight called math-way that u can solve problems on...hope that was helpful


You might be interested in
In a​ survey, 32​% of the respondents stated that they talk to their pets on the telephone. A veterinarian believed this result
adoni [48]

Answer:

z=\frac{0.29 -0.32}{\sqrt{\frac{0.32(1-0.32)}{210}}}=-0.932  

p_v =P(z  

So the p value obtained was a very high value and using the significance level given \alpha=0.05 we have p_v>\alpha so we can conclude that we have enough evidence to FAIL to reject the null hypothesis, and we can said that at 5% of significance the proportion of  pet owners contacted by telephone is NOT significantly lower than 0.32

Step-by-step explanation:

Data given and notation

n=210 represent the random sample taken

X=61 represent the number of pet owners contacted by telephone

\hat p=\frac{61}{210}=0.29 estimated proportion of  pet owners contacted by telephone

p_o=0.32 is the value that we want to test

\alpha=0.05 represent the significance level

Confidence=95% or 0.95

z would represent the statistic (variable of interest)

p_v represent the p value (variable of interest)  

Concepts and formulas to use  

We need to conduct a hypothesis in order to test the claim that the true proportions is lower than 0.32.:  

Null hypothesis:p \geq 0.32  

Alternative hypothesis:p < 0.32  

When we conduct a proportion test we need to use the z statistic, and the is given by:  

z=\frac{\hat p -p_o}{\sqrt{\frac{p_o (1-p_o)}{n}}} (1)  

The One-Sample Proportion Test is used to assess whether a population proportion \hat p is significantly different from a hypothesized value p_o.

Calculate the statistic  

Since we have all the info requires we can replace in formula (1) like this:  

z=\frac{0.29 -0.32}{\sqrt{\frac{0.32(1-0.32)}{210}}}=-0.932  

Statistical decision  

It's important to refresh the p value method or p value approach . "This method is about determining "likely" or "unlikely" by determining the probability assuming the null hypothesis were true of observing a more extreme test statistic in the direction of the alternative hypothesis than the one observed". Or in other words is just a method to have an statistical decision to fail to reject or reject the null hypothesis.  

The significance level provided \alpha=0.05. The next step would be calculate the p value for this test.  

Since is a left tailed test the p value would be:  

p_v =P(z  

So the p value obtained was a very high value and using the significance level given \alpha=0.05 we have p_v>\alpha so we can conclude that we have enough evidence to FAIL to reject the null hypothesis, and we can said that at 5% of significance the proportion of  pet owners contacted by telephone is NOT significantly lower than 0.32

3 0
3 years ago
2/4+1=1/6 x-7 what is the value of x in this epuation
Ksivusya [100]
X=51
I hope this is correct and is this the answer you’re looking for?
5 0
3 years ago
Write a subtraction fact with the same difference as 16-7
Flauer [41]
16-7 is 9, so basically you could do, and these are not the only ones you can do.. 100-91 10-1 15-6 20-11
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
A farmer has some chickens and rabbits. There are 60 eyes and 100 legs altogether. How many chickens and how many rabbits are th
expeople1 [14]

Answer:

20 rabbits, 10 chickens

Step-by-step explanation:

Because chickens and rabbits each have 2 eyes, the number of animals is 60 ÷ 2 = 30.

Let's say that all of the 30 animals are chickens. There would be a total of 30 × 2 = 60 legs.

So the extra (100 – 60) = 40 legs must have come from the rabbits.

Every rabbit has (4 – 2) = 2 more legs than a chicken.

So there are 40 ÷ 2 = 20 rabbits and 30 – 20 = 10 chickens.

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
800 people went to the community library last week. This week that number increased by 15% how many people went to the library t
KonstantinChe [14]
920 people webt to the library. Hope that helps :)
5 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • How are the graphs of the functions f(x) = V16 and g(x) = 3/64 related?
    15·1 answer
  • Out of 25000 students figure out the percent of 3700, how would i do that?
    11·2 answers
  • You are caring for a resident receiving enteral feeding through a peg tube. He is receiving 50ml jevity per hour to run for four
    11·1 answer
  • 48 divided by 4,756 <br><br> im really behind-
    13·2 answers
  • Which expression is equivalent to (4 + 6i)2?
    6·2 answers
  • Can someone explain to me what it means to be marked as branliest? &amp; what it does ?
    13·1 answer
  • What is the next number in the sequence? -1, 5, -25
    9·1 answer
  • What is the difference between scaling up and scaling down a ration?
    8·1 answer
  • -2/5x - 1/2 + x = -40/11
    5·1 answer
  • 2.) A shop sells oranges at 6 for N100. A trader sells the same kind of oranges at 8 for N120.
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!