Answer: E
Conclusion E is most appropriate
Step-by-step explanation:
Rebounds and wins are positively correlated, but we cannot conclude that getting more rebounds causes more wins, on average.
Because if a scatterplot shows a strong, positive, linear relationship between two variables, then the two variables are positively correlated but there is no causation between them.
That would be the last choice.
The formula for the circumference = 2 pi r.
Well, let's take a peek at the graph of that line, hmmm let's pick two points, heck, those tow on the extremes anyway, and those are (-5,2) and (5,-1), alrite.. now, let's do some checking on that.

Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
First, we need to find the y-intercept. The y-intercept is the intersection of the point on the y-axis. We can clearly tell that the y-intercept is 1. The slope is definitely 0 because it shows a straight line.
Hence, the equation is y = 1.
Please check out my graph to support my reasoning.
Answer:
This proof can be done by contradiction.
Let us assume that 2 - √2 is rational number.
So, by the definition of rational number, we can write it as

where a & b are any integer.
⇒ 
Since, a and b are integers
is also rational.
and therefore √2 is rational number.
This contradicts the fact that √2 is irrational number.
Hence our assumption that 2 - √2 is rational number is false.
Therefore, 2 - √2 is irrational number.