It is risky to invest in a commodity because: <span>The commodity's price might drop significantly very quicklly
</span>Commodity products are circulated really quickly. This will affect the rarity of the product in the markets. If the rarity is high, the price will increase and vice versa. This exact condition makes the price for that commodity also fluctuated really quickly.
<u>Colonial:</u> Colonialism is a type of policy where control by one power or nation over another country as well as dependent area. Generally, the aim is related to economic dominant of colonized country
<u>Socio-cultural imperialism:</u> Socio-cultural imperialism related to culture. They imposed their culture to non- dominance country through economically or politically.
<u>Economic imperialism: </u>A situation where dominating country has lots of economic power over non-dominance country or area.
<u>Similarities: </u>These all are affected non-dominance country. Colonialism and imperialism both means domination in political and economic over other country or area.
<u>Difference: </u>The major difference is colonialism means complete control over the other country but imperialism means formally or informally control over other country
This is an (international site).
Question:
What is the Literacy rate in the United States?
Answer:
<span>Literacy is 32 million adults in the U.S. can't read. </span>That's like about 14 percent of the population.
Plus 21 percent<span> of adults in the U.S do read below a 5th grade level.
</span>
Also 19 percent<span> of high school graduates can't read</span>
Hope this helps!
Answer:
In Schenck v. United States, the Supreme Court <u><em>ruled that bans on dangerous speech were constitutional.</em></u>
Explanation:
In the 1919 Supreme Court case of Schenck v. the United States, the court deemed the actions of Charles Schenck and Elizabeth Baer as unconstitutional. It deemed them criminals for trying to obstruct the government's drafting of men for war and that it is an act against the security of the nation.
This case revolves around the claim that the obstruction of Schenck and Baer's free speech was unconstitutional and they have the right to express their opinions. But the court insisted that since the leaflets they distributed were against national security, the First Amendment doesn't apply to them.
Thus, the correct answer is the second option.
