Answer:
It would be B or D (D is my best bet) (But D isn't the last battle)
Explain: The battle of New Orleans wasn't actually the last battle/
Answer:
THREE BRANCHES OF GOVERNMENT:
- LEGISLATIVE
- EXECUTIVE
- JUDICIAL
Legislative will propose the bills, and send on to executive.
Executive can veto the bill, or approve the bill.
Note - 2/3 of Congress can agree to override the veto.
If the Executive passes, Judicial makes sure it is not unconstitutional.
This is how the laws we use are passed.
Your answer is A, bank of america.
I think the summary judgement would be inappropriate in this case
Summary judgement is entered by the court if the plaintiff does not have sufficient evidence that the defendants actually do what they're accused of before moving to trial.
On this case, There is a strong proof that peoples restaurant is aware of Hoag's alcoholism : <u>intoxicated</u>
This mean that sabo can proof that the bar know hoag is an alcoholic and had served enough amount to hoag to get him intoxicated.
This mean that Sabo's case is strong enough to be brought to the trial. keep in mind that Sabo is unlikely to win the trial since the restaurant does not directly involved in the accident. but we can definitely say that summary judgement would be inappropriate in this case.
Answer:
The subject and predicate (verb) are missing, including a conjunction between "kindest" and "most."
Explanation:
When the subject, a verb, and a conjunction are added to the phrase "the kindest most generous person in the world," it will then become a sentence. In its present form, it remains a phrase, that is, a group of words without meaning. For example, we can correctly rephrase the above into a sentence as: "John remains the kindest and most generous person in the world."
