Answer: Not fully.
Explanation: Even in communist societies, where the concept is for everyone to have the same thing, there is tension between different groups for inherent traits. It depends on your definition of "differences". If there were a group of people who knew nothing of racism, sexism, or any other -ism, it still wouldn't be possible for a society to be entirely accepting of others' differences. For example, maybe someone doesn't like someone else because of the pitch of their voice or a certain personality trait. Those are differences that you may not accept. Other differences could be actions some view as unforgivable, such as theft. In conclusion, I don't believe it's possible to have a society that fully accepts one another's differences. It is possible to have one that gets along together well, or even claims to love each other in all ways, but there will always be conflict between person to person and person to self. It's just life.
They challenged the tradition and expanded the Amercia. Literary canon
Answer: I believe it would be letter (b)
Explanation: I had to answer this question yesterday and I am pretty sure this is the answer. Because it asks ¨the narrator gives an example of why oxygen is vital to climbers on Mt. Everest. How does the narrator develop this concept in the rest of the narrative?¨ so this is really the only plausible answer regarding the question.
Hey You!
The Best Genre That Describes His Process Is: Religious Allegory.
The correct answer is A. In the Gettysburg Address, saving the Union is the focus. President Abraham Lincoln delivered two of the greatest speeches in American history during the Civil War from 1861 to 1865, Gettysburg Address and Second Inaugural Address. The inaugural address was devoted altogether to saving the Union without war. Both parties had different thoughts, and the war came.
