Answer:
A Type I error would occur if there was no evidence of an improvement on the national exam but there really was improvement.
Step-by-step explanation:
A type 1 error simply occurs when we incorrectly reject a true null hypothesis. In the scenario above, An experiment was conducted in other it know if there is sufficient evidence to support a claim that a new teaching method developed improves students score. If this claim is actually true in the real sense. However, after conducting a statistical test, we conuded that there was no sufficient evidence to support her claim of improvement using the new method, hence, the claim was rejected. By rejecting the claim, a true null has been rejected. Hence, a type 1 error has been committed.
Answer:
16
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
x-intercepts exist where y is equal to 0. Where y is equal to 0 is where the graph goes through the x-axis. Our x-intercepts are (2x-3), (x + 3), and (x-4). Again, since x-intercepts exist where y = 0, then by the Zero Product Property, 2x - 3 = 0, x - 4 = 0, and x + 3 = 0. In the first x-intercept:
2x - 3 = 0 and
2x = 3 so
x = 3/2
In the second:
x - 4 = 0 so
x = 4
In the third:
x + 3 = 0 so
x = -3
So the x-intercepts in the correct order are x = 3/2, 4, -3
Width = w
Length = 5w
Given,
Perimeter = 276 ft
5w * w = 276
w² = 55.2
--- w = 7.429670248402684 ≈ 7.43 ft
--- l = 5w = 5*7.43 = <span>37.14835124201342 </span>≈ 37.15 ft
Answer:
he will earn more if he walks Puff .
Step-by-step explanation:
This is because they are seven days in a week which will make him gain $70 per week if he walks puff but will gain $60 per week if he walks shane so caleb should walk puff if he wants to gain more.
