Hello. You did not present the experiment to which this question refers, which makes it impossible for me to give you an answer. However, when searching for your question on the internet, I was able to find another question exactly the same as yours, which showed that Rachel was studying the causes and consequences of treating mental illness in patients with generalized anxiety disorder. In this experiment, she gave each participant an untested drug, a placebo and a nocebo and assessed how these substances altered the arousal of the sympathetic nervous system one week before and one week after the study.
If that is the case with her question, the two reactions that Rachel could use to operate the dependent variable would be placebo and nocebo.
We can reach this conclusion because both the nocebo and the placebo do not generate real effects in the participants, but it causes psychological effects, imagined by the patient, against the real medicine. In this case, both the placebo and the nocebo are capable of provoking pisological effects in the excitation of the sympathetic nervous system of the patients. Within an experiment, the variable that has the power to provoke something is the independent variable and it is this variable that allows the researcher to operate the dependent variable. In this case, we can consider that the nocebo and the placebo are the independent variables that can manipulate the dependent variable, which is the sympathetic nervous system excitation.
It is the capitalist economy
Answer:
Your answer would be B He thought of himself as a patriot. Even though he opposed slavery.
Answer:
power outages
Explanation:
Living in an urban area, I have frequent power outages myself. Population density would be more in the city areas like japan. Lack of personal time would be a personal problem. Shortage of water is mainly in places like africa.
The answer is "it empowers our ensured industries to accomplish technological efficiency and accordingly end up competitive with mature foreign industries."
The infant industry argument is a financial reason for exchange protectionism. The center of the contention is that incipient ventures frequently don't have the economies of scale that their more established rivals from different nations may have, and consequently should be ensured until the point that they can achieve comparable economies of scale.
