The term gender gap denotes the disproportionate difference or disparity between the sexes, between males in females.<span>The bigger the gap, the bigger the difference between genders and the smaller equality between the.The smaller the gender gap on the other hand the greater the equality between genders. </span><span>
The countries with the smallest difference between their male and female students are those with </span>the greatest degree of overall gender equality.
yes, because some cultures can be part misognystic or just don't want their women playing sport. reasons for tthat would be that they want women involved in things which are important then spoorts. they might think sport is just a hobby rather than a job or something u can make money from.
Mark me as the brainliest, please
Answer:
John Adams
Explanation:
Although he was one of the Patriot leaders in Boston, the 35-year-old Adams believed that it was vital that the British soldiers and their captain receive fair trials.
please mark as brainliest if I helped you
<u>Answer</u>: The <u>Legalists </u>philosophers believed that every aspect of life should be governed by strict and impersonal laws.
The Legalism is the third intellectual current that flourished in China before the unification by the Qin Dynasty. The three centuries before the unification were so rich in terms of political thought that is known as “The Golden Age of Chinese Philosophy” with “The Hundred Schools” of thoughts. Other famous schools in this period are Confucianism and Taoism.
The long period of war were times of great chaos and disorder. Profound changes happened during these three centuries – economical, military and social changes. A new administrative approach needed to arise and the Legalists were at the forefront of this innovation.
Legalism is the most practical current of that period. Legalists would not focus on philosophical speculations, such as the evolution of the human nature, morality or divine will. Instead, they focus on how to achieve the goal of unification. Nothing, not even the past, could distract them of this goal. Because of that, they defended that the past doesn’t teach a thing and doesn’t shape the present or the future, but a radical change in the present is the only way to restructure the society. This change could only happen by “the rule of the law”, where individual morality of the ruled and the rulers are not taken into consideration. They believed that every aspect of life should be governed by strict and impersonal laws. Applying those is the radical change that would create a powerful government, able to coerce its subjects and install a rich state and a powerful army. In that scenario, the state has the ultimate authority and such power is given to it by means of military strength.
Answer:
c) proactive interference
Explanation:
Proactive interference: Proactive interference happens when the past memories of a person hold him or her from retaining and maintaining new memories.
The proactive interference occurs when a person memorizes a piece of information, for example, formulas and when the person is being asked to remember or recall that information then he or she might forget the earlier part of the information.
Example: A man calls his current girlfriend by his ex-girlfriend's name.
In the question above, the difficulty of Janice is best illustrated by the proactive interference.
