If the results of a experiment do not support the hypothesis this does not necessarily mean that the experiment was a failure or that the hypothesis was wrong, but simply that the test that was conducted did not find results that were significant and also showed that the "null hypothesis" was incorrect. Therefore, if a hypothesis is shown to be inaccurate by a particular experiment the issue might need further experimentation because it could be wrong or it could not, but this does not mean the experiment was a failure. In fact proving a hypothesis can be informative for conducting further experiments to conclude what caused the phenomena if not the original hypothesis.
The moral values in which had placed an example above, can be distinguished from religious ones, like attending the church, is contingent on the person's beliefs and behaviors. His or her moral values will likely take result because of his or her beliefs and it could be distinguished whether he or she is a religious one.
Answer:
i think its "As Europeans moved beyond exploration and into colonization of the Americas, they brought changes to virtually every aspect of the land and its people, from trade and hunting to warfare and personal property. European goods, ideas, and diseases shaped the changing continent." im not 100% sure but this is my guess!
Explanation:
hope you get it right!!! MARK ME BRAINLIEST!, xo
The correct answer in the space provided is state. He is likely studying the state of consciousness, it is because the state of consciousness covers the awareness of a person that occurs in his or her daily life. An example of it is when a person is walking, dreaming, eating in which occurs in their everyday life.
