I find it easiest to subtract and add the percentages to make a multiplier, then use that.
After the man's discount, he pays (100% - 12%) = 88% of the list price. After tax, he pays (100% + 3%) = 103% of the discounted price.
The amount he actually pays is $255×0.88×1.03 = $231.13.
The best choice is ...
(B) $231.13
Answer:
49/21
Step-by-step explanation:
You just have to switch the numerator and denominator so you can cancel out the number from one side of the equation in a normal problem
The correct pair is option E, which is:
FH ≅ FH - reflexive property
ΔGFH ≅ ΔEFH - SAS theorem
<h3>What is the SAS Congruence Theorem?</h3>
The SAS theorems states that two triangles are congruent if they have two pairs of congruent sides and a pair of congruent included angles.
<h3>What is the Reflexive Property?</h3>
The reflexive property of geometry states that an angle or line will always be congruent to itself.
In the two column-proof, since FH = FH using the reflexive property, then both triangles are congruent to each other by the SAS congruence theorem.
The missing pair of reasons that completes the proof are:
FH ≅ FH - reflexive property
ΔGFH ≅ ΔEFH - SAS theorem
Learn more about the SAS theorem on:
brainly.com/question/2102943
#SPJ1
The answer is D. This is because when you take 10.65 and subtract 9.95 from it you get 0.07. If you take this number and continuously add to 9.95 you get the numbers provided in the chart. We'll also notice that the 0.07 is only added after 10 minutes of talking (10,20,30,etc.).
Neither one will ever hit the axis I think? if its x=3.5 then its horizontal but its above the x axis. Same with the second one. its vertical and will never hit the y axis. Not sure how to write that into those boxes but I think there isn't an intercept.
