Answer:
a. In conclusion, due to the vast catalog and the fact that Stephen King is still writing, it is impossible to declare that any of Stephen King’s works as his best.
Explanation:
The conclusion paragraph is the restatement of the main argument(s) made in the essay. This means that whatever has been discussed in detail in the essay's body paragraphs, the conclusion merely sums up and restates the main point(s).
And on that note, the best start of a conclusion paragraph about Stephen King's best work will be to state that there cannot be any best work by the author as he is still actively writing novels, thereby making it possible to produce better works in the coming future too.
Thus, the correct answer is option a.
They searched for El Dorado one of the infamous cities in the andes.
The two leading men who were leading writers of comedies in the early period of Latin literature were Titus Maccius Plautus (AKA Plautus) and Publius Terentius Afer (AKA Terrence).
Hope this helps! :)
Answer:
It could carry more weight
Explanation:
The horse made a much better work animal than the dog because it could carry more weight than a dog. just by the fact it's so much bigger, so much stronger. It's strength was definitely the major reason why it was preferred to the dog, but the horse also adapts easily to its environment. Even if a horse eats more than a dog, because of its size, the benefits of using it for work are much bigger.
It's also much more calm and docile than most dogs, although some dog races are quite good at training and being used as assistance animal for the handicapped or blind people.