The answer is superseding. An intervening cause will by and large clear the tortfeasor of obligation for the casualty's damage just if the occasion is esteemed a superseding cause. A superseding cause is an unforeseeable intervening cause. By differentiate, a predictable intervening cause commonly does not break the chain of causality, implying that the tortfeasor is as yet in charge of the casualty's damage—unless the occasion prompts an unforeseeable outcome.
Hey there!
Erik Erikson developed and proposed 8 p<span>sychosocial stages of life. These, in order, are trust vs. mistrust, autonomy vs. shame, initiative vs. guilt, industry vs. inferiority, ego identity vs. role confusion, intimacy vs. isolation, generativity vs. stagnation, and ego integrity vs. despair.
It sounds like the last one, ego integrity vs. despair, is described in your problem. The last stage begins around maturity, or 65, and goes on until death. At this stage, people are often retiring or are retired, and start pondering the things they didn't do with their lives. This leads to regret about not doing certain things that they once hoped to do, or maybe didn't even realize they wanted to do at the time. They think that it's too late now, and start feeling dissatisfied with their life, as your question describes.
Hope this helped you out! :-)</span>
The statement above is talking about the Drive Reduction Theory. This theory, proposed by Clark Hull in 1943, talks about a certain drive that develops when a disturbance occurs in an individual's homeostasis or simply put, when someone has physical needs that need to be met.
