According to craik and tulving, how do we process verbal information best? visual encoding

1 answer:

6 0

The best thing that we process the verbal information is by the use of semantic encoding according to Craik and Tulving. Semantic Encoding is defined as the encoding and processing of sensory input that has a particular meaning or can be applied to a context. One of the good example of semantic encoding is you might remember a particular phone number based on a person's name or a particular food by its color.

You might be interested in

Elena's boss told her that she is being let go due to the downsizing of the company. Later that day when she gets home, she is c

alex41 [277]

Answer:

Resentful

Explanation:

Definition: "feeling or expressing bitterness or indignation at having been treated unfairly." this perfectly describes Elena's feeling toward her friend.

5 0

2 years ago

How does a church exercise control over its members

Marianna [84]

Answer:

pushing the bible on to people

Explanation:

3 0

3 years ago

Of the six key traits of leadership, which is the foundation of all good leaders?

Alex Ar [27]

Integrity is the foundation of all good leaders of the six key leadership traits.

<h3>What is the foundation of all good leaders?</h3>

A leader's success depends on a variety of qualities, but they must also possess intelligence, charisma, determination, sociability, and integrity to be successful. Being transparent and honest with one's followers is a requirement of integrity. One of the six essential qualities of a leader is vision. The decision-makers must make sure that they consider all the elements that will strengthen the foundations. Additionally, they must have the necessary educational credentials, professional experience, personality qualities, a kind disposition, an approachable demeanor, and other talents and competencies.

To learn more about Leadership, Visit:

brainly.com/question/7015854

#SPJ4

6 0

2 years ago

Why did banks close in the United States at the time of the crash?

Mariana [72]

D.they dis not want the goverment to regulate them.

8 0

3 years ago

How might coca-cola have responded differently when this situation first occurred, especially in terms of responding to negative

erma4kov [3.2K]

<span>As indicated by the article, Coca-Cola did not react quickly enough to alleviate and pacify its purchasers that its Coke items are harmless and lawful. As indicated by Coke's </span>social responsibility commitments, the assertions of legislators spread quickly through India. Nonetheless, the organization neglected to acknowledge how quick news went to. Rather than looking to recover the trust and support from its clients, Coke concentrated excessively on different workarounds. Coca-Cola shaped advisory groups in India and the US. The advisory groups invested energy to run the tests, besides; Coke was quiet to its shoppers. As specified by Mr. Seth, Coke's Indian advertising expert, in the Indian culture, "Here individuals translate silence as crime". Buyers needed to hear the official clarification from Coca-Cola instantly and they would not like to hold up later. At long last, Coca-Cola safeguarded their organization by claiming that different organizations have comparative issues like Coke.

7 0

3 years ago