1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
frozen [14]
3 years ago
15

What was one major outcome of the Vietnamese resistance to french colonial rule in Indochina during the 19th century

History
1 answer:
babymother [125]3 years ago
8 0

The correct answer is D. it gave the French an excuse to seize even more of the Vietnamese land. Later on in the 20th century, Fance stuggled to control it's territories in Indochina. In the end, after the war in 1954. it complete lost it's territories and had to give up after the battle at Dien Bien Phu.

You might be interested in
In the early and mid-1800s, sectionalism was strongest
Digiron [165]
<span>1. If my memory serves me well, in the early and mid-1800's, sectionalism was strongest </span><span>in the South, where people felt their economy depended on slavery. After the invention of the cotton there were very high demand for slave labor and slavery become the necessary part of agricultural output in the South. 

2. I am definitely sure that, </span>Henry Clay’s American System, which was established in the early 1800's, <span>placed tariffs on foreign imports to build roads and infrastructure. The main goal of Henry Clay's American System was to support the domestic economy of the United States.

3. As far as I remember, </span>South Carolina eventually repealed its Ordinance of Nullification in exchange for <span>the federal elimination of the Tariff of 1828 and a gradual reduction on import taxes over a decade.

4. The best description of the nullification is: </span><span>the idea that a state could refuse to follow a federal law it disagreed with. That means, the state has the right to nullify any federal law if they see it unconstitutional.</span>
7 0
3 years ago
Which of the following statements about War Democrats is TRUE?
ruslelena [56]

Answer:

B.

They called for immediate peace with the Confederacy.

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Which of the following is true for both presidents roosevelt and wilson
Kipish [7]

Answer:

The options are

A. They believed in a policy of non-interference in Latin America.

B. They resorted frequently to the use of U.S. troops in Latin America.

C. They feared that Latin America countries would invade the United States.

D. They worked to promote human rights and national integrity in Latin America.

The answer is B. They resorted frequently to the use of U.S. troops in Latin America.

President Roosevelt and Wilson both ruled the US and were similar and different in their approach to various conditions.

Roosevelt believed in a policy of non-interference in Latin America while Wilson didn’t.They also had differences in fearing that Latin America countries would invade the United States and working to promote human rights and national integrity in Latin America. They had a similar policy in the aspect of resorting frequently to the use of U.S. troops in Latin America.

5 0
3 years ago
How did the Warsaw Pact influence the course of the Cold War?
Monica [59]

Answer:

The correct answer is Option D) It acted as a deterrent to NATO, the military alliance formed by the United States and  Western Europe, leading to a stalemate in Europe.​

Explanation:

United States and it's allies had formed the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) in 1949 as a mutual defense agreement between 12 countries from North America and Western European.

This was clearly seen as major powers coming together to form a collective block against the rise of Soviet Union.

Eventually the Soivet Union responded by singing the Warsaw Pact, a mutual defense agreement between 8 counties in 1955. It was a deterrent against, what was seen as US led influence in the region and resulted in a stalemate.

4 0
4 years ago
What do athens and sparta's government both have in common?
STatiana [176]
They both had a partially elected goverment

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What would government be like if there were no political parties
    15·2 answers
  • For how many years did the Etruscans control Rome? a. 59 years c. 141 years b. 163 years d. 202 years
    8·2 answers
  • O.
    9·2 answers
  • Why trade is so important to the empire
    15·1 answer
  • What system allowed people free passage to the colonies in return for a
    5·2 answers
  • How did barbarian groups affect the Western Roman Empire? Various barbarian groups weakened the empire with a series of invasion
    6·2 answers
  • The Catholic Church focused on religious art. After the Reformation, the Protestant Church shifted the focus from religious art
    6·1 answer
  • What is cultural minority?
    13·2 answers
  • Why did Columbus plan to colonize Hispaniola? A to profit from shipping gold, sugar, and Indian slaves to Spain B to launch atta
    10·1 answer
  • Worth 50 pts will mark brainliest
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!