Answer:
Popular sovereignty, also called squatter sovereignty, in U.S. history, a controversial political doctrine according to which the people of federal territories should decide for themselves whether their territories would enter the Union as free or slave states. Its enemies, especially in New England, called it “squatter sovereignty.”
Answer and Explanation:
1. If the term "trade" is interpreted strictly, the concept of free trade will be undermined. This is because the literal interpretation will give the State the power to completely control and manage trade, which interferes with the concepts of economic liberalism which states that the State should not meddle in commercial matters beyond the protection of property.
2. As a consequence of this strict interpretation there would be consequences in the relations between large and small companies, since the State could interfere in the way they are established and how they compete with each other.
Christian crusaders drove muslims out of Spain by the 1000s king fernandan and queen Isabella unify spain
Answer:
To colonize is to settle in, and take control of, land outside your own borders. There are many examples through history of powerful countries that colonized various regions of the world in order to gain natural resources or to obtain more land for their citizens to live in.
Answer:
no
Explanation:
because the crisis that was going on was in extreme measures and was a massive issue, if there was a issue as great as slavery then yes, but they need to have a amazing reason for it and congress should vote on it
