Answer:
A
Explanation:
For functions to be inverse, it must be true that f( g(x) ) = x and g( f(x) ) = x.
But for F( G(x) ), we have √( G(x) - 3 ) + 8
= √( (x+8)² - 3 - 3 ) + 8
= √( (x+8)² - 6 ) + 8
This -6 part should be cancelled out for functions to work out but we cannot do that, therefore F(x) and G(x) are not inverse.
It would be something that looks like this:
((6390 * 0.17)/365) x 3
Answer:
∠ 2 = 70°
Step-by-step explanation:
110° and ∠ 1 are corresponding angles and congruent, thus
∠ 1 = 110°
∠ 1 and ∠ 2 are adjacent angles and are supplementary, thus
∠ 2 = 180° - ∠ 1 = 180° - 110° = 70°
The information given about the proof does that Daniel made an error on line 2.
<h3>How to illustrate the information?</h3>
Given:
1. AB = 3x +2; BC = 4x + 8; AC = 38
2. AB + BC = AC incorrect (not an angle angle addition postulate)
3. 3x+2 + 4x + 8 = 38 correct
4. 7x + 10 = 38 correct
5. 7x = 28 correct
6. x = 4
Daniel made an error on line 2.
Here is the complete question:
Daniel wrote the following two-column proof for the given information. Given: AB = 3x + 2; BC = 4x + 8; AC = 38 Prove: x = 4 Statements Reason 1. AB = 3x + 2; BC = 4x + 8; AC = 38 1. Given 2. AB + BC = AC 2. Angle Addition Postulate 3. 3x + 2 + 4x + 8 = 38 3. Substitution Property of Equality 4. 7x + 10 = 38 4. Combining Like Terms 5. 7x = 28 5. Subtraction Property of Equality 6. x = 4 6. Division Property of Equality On which line, did Daniel make his error? line 2 line 3 line 4 line 5
Learn more about proof on:
brainly.com/question/4134755
#SPJ1
Answer:
<h2>Hey , option B is correct ....</h2>
as two angles are equal