Answer:
<u>B. There is sufficient evidence that the mean of the pressure required to open a certain valve has changed. </u>
Step-by-step explanation:
We make this conclusion based on these reasons:
- We are told that the "null hypothesis was rejected" after the <em>"manager feels that the pressure variability has changed.,</em> meaning the <u>null hypothesis was the opposite of what occurred; that is to say, it is the alternate hypothesis that proved true instead.</u>
- <em>"changes in the manufacturing process"</em> form what can be called "sufficient evidence" that the mean of the pressure required to open the valve has changed, thereby going against the null hypothesis.
It is based on the above reasons that the null hypothesis was rejected.
In Step 2, Lara did not ensure that the second diamter was perpendicualr to the first diameter she drew.
The correct steps should be:
Step 1: Use the straightedge to draw a diameter of the circle. Label the points at which the diameter touches the circle as A and B.
Step 2: Draw a second diameter <em>perpendicular to the first diameter</em>. Label the points at which the second diameter touches the circle as C and D.
Step 3: Join the end points of the two diameters to form a square.
Since L1//L2 , angle 1 = angle 5
Should be... x ÷ -1.5 = 21
Answer:
x = $42.8
Step-by-step explanation:
Let
Amount of money shalee has in Sept = $x
Shalee October earnings = $48.24
Total money = $x + $48.24
She spent 3/4 of the money on dress
3/4 of (x + 48.24) = $68.28
3/4 * x + 48.24 = 68.28
3/4x + 144.72/4 = 68.28
3/4x + 36.18 = 68.28
3/4x = 68.28 - 36.18
3/4x = 32.10
x = 32.10 ÷ 3/4
= 32.10 × 4/3
= 128.4/3
= 42.8
x = $42.8
