1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Zarrin [17]
3 years ago
9

A food distributor is being sued for racial discrimination because 12% of newly hired candidates are not white when 53% of all a

pplicants were not white. You plan to use hypothesis testing to determine whether there is significant evidence that the company's hiring practices are discriminatory.
Mathematics
1 answer:
Musya8 [376]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

Check Explanation

Step-by-step explanation:

A) The null hypothesis would be that the proportion of newly hired candidates that are not white is not significantly different from the proportion of the applicants that are not white & there is no significant evidence that the company's hiring practices are discriminatory.

Mathematically,

H₀: μ₀ = 0.53

And the alternative hypothesis would be that there is a significant difference between the proportion of newly hired candidates that are not white is not significantly different from the proportion of the applicants that are not white. More specifically, that the proportion of newly hired candidates that are not white is significantly less than the proportion of applicants that are not white & there is significant evidence that the company's hiring practices are indeed discriminatory.

Mathematically,

Hₐ: μ₀ < 0.53

B) The two errors that can come up in this hypothesis testing include -

Type I error: We reject the null hypothesis because we obtain that the proportion of newly hired candidates that are not white is significantly less than the proportion of applicants that are not white and conclude that there is indeed significant evidence that the company's hiring practices are discriminatory when in reality, there is no significant difference and hence, no discrimination.

Type II error: We accept the null hypothesis (fail to reject the null hypothesis) because we obtained that there is no significant difference between the proportion of newly hired candidates that are not white & th proportion of applicants that are not white and conclude that there is no discrimination in the company's hiring practices when in reality, there is significant difference in the stated proportions above and significant evidence that there is indeed significant evidence that the company's hiring practices are discriminatory.

C) The power of the test increases as the significance level reduces. This is because t-statistic increases as significance level reduces.

D) The standard error of the mean used in computing the t-score is given as

σₓ = (σ/√n)

It is evident that as the value of n increases, the standard error reduces and this widens the effect of the test, hence, the power of the test increases.

Hope this Helps!!!

You might be interested in
Find the first four terms of the sequence given by the following.<br> aₙ=43-3(n-1) n=1,2,3. . .
Serggg [28]

Given :-

  • The general term of a sequence is given by aₙ=43-3(n-1) .

To Find :-

  • The first four terms of the sequence.

Solution :-

The given expression is /

→ aₙ=43-3(n-1)

where n > 0

<u>Finding</u><u> the</u><u> </u><u>first </u><u>term </u><u>:</u>

Substituting n = 1 , we have ,

→ T1 = 43 - 3(1-1)

→ T1 = 43 - 3*0

→ T1 = 43 - 0 = 43

<u>Finding</u><u> the</u><u> </u><u>second</u><u> </u><u>term </u><u>:</u>

Substituting n = 2 , we have,

→ T2 = 43 -3(2-1)

→ T2 = 43 -3*1

→ T2 = 43 -3 = 40

<u>Finding</u><u> </u><u>the </u><u>third </u><u>term</u><u> </u><u>:</u>

Substituting n = 3 , we have,

→ T3 = 43 -3(3-1)

→ T3 = 43 -3*2

→ T3 = 43 -6 = 37

<u>Finding</u><u> the</u><u> </u><u>fourth</u><u> </u><u>term </u><u>:</u>

→ T4 = 43 -3(4-1)

→ T4 = 43 -3*3

→ T4 = 43-9 = 34

<u>Hence</u><u> the</u><u> </u><u>first</u><u> </u><u>four</u><u> terms</u><u> of</u><u> </u><u>the</u><u> </u><u>sequence</u><u> </u><u>are </u><u>4</u><u>3</u><u> </u><u>,</u><u> </u><u>4</u><u>0</u><u> </u><u>,</u><u> </u><u>37</u><u> </u><u>and </u><u>34</u><u> </u><u>.</u>

<em>I </em><em>hope</em><em> this</em><em> helps</em><em> </em><em>.</em><em> </em><em>Let </em><em>me</em><em> know</em><em> if</em><em> you</em><em> </em><em>need </em><em>further</em><em> </em><em>clarification</em><em> </em><em>.</em>

7 0
2 years ago
Which of the following is NOT one of the three major credit bureaus?
vovangra [49]
What are the options ?
3 0
3 years ago
There were 12 cookies on plates. Think of all the possible ways to divide the 12 cookies evenly between playes
xenn [34]
6,6
2,2,2,2,2,2
3,3,3,3
6 0
3 years ago
PART A: A landmark on the first map is a triangle with side lengths of 3 cm, 4 cm, and 5 cm. What are the side lengths of the tr
Greeley [361]

Complete Question:

Johnny printed two maps of a walking trail near his home. The length of the walking trail on the first map is 8 cm.

(a) Choose a length between 5 cm and 15 cm for the walking trail on the second map: ________cm.  

(b) Determine the scale factor from the first map to the second map.

(c)  A landmark on the first map is a triangle with side lengths of 3 cm, 4 cm, and 5 cm. What are the side lengths of the triangle landmark on the second map?  

(d) Draw one of the triangles from part C. Label the side lengths and vertices accordingly. You may use this drawing tool or draw your triangle on paper:

Answer:

(a) Length = 4cm

(b) Scale factor = 0.5

(c) 3cm, 4cm and 5cm are represented by 1.5cm, 2cm and 2.5cm respectively, on the second scale

(d) See attachment for triangle

Step-by-step explanation:

(a) Choose a length between 5 cm and 15 cm

Length =4cm <em>--- This is solely up to you (you can make use of any length between 5 cm and 15 cm)</em>

(b) The scale factor

The scale factor (k) is calculated as:

k = \frac{New\ Length}{Old\ Length}

k = \frac{4cm}{8cm}\\

k = 0.5

(c) What are side lengths of 3 cm, 4 cm, and 5 cm on the second landmark

Using:

k = \frac{New\ Length}{Old\ Length}

The old lengths, in this case are: 3cm, 4cm and 5cm

Make New length the subject

New\ Length = k * Old\ Length

When Length = 3cm

New\ Length = 0.5 * 3cm = 1.5cm

When Length = 4cm

New\ Length = 0.5 * 4cm = 2cm

When Length = 5cm

New\ Length = 0.5 * 5cm = 2.5cm

So: 3cm, 4cm and 5cm are represented by 1.5cm, 2cm and 2.5cm respectively, on the second scale

(d) See attachment for triangle

7 0
3 years ago
From given figure write the radiation between m and n.​
Ulleksa [173]

Answer:

see explanation

Step-by-step explanation:

m and n are same- side interior angles and sum to 180°

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which of the following is equivalent to 3 x − 6 2 x + 4 6 x − 12 4 x + 8 ? Assume no denominator is equal to zero.
    15·1 answer
  • Using the correct number of significant figures?
    15·1 answer
  • On average, for every 15 points scored by his basketball team, riley scores 4 of them. about how many points would you expect ri
    6·2 answers
  • 15(2-x)=13(3-x) pls help
    15·2 answers
  • Which equation shows the point slope form of the line that passes through (5,1) and has a slope of 1/2
    14·1 answer
  • Can someone answer this one it’s urgent
    9·1 answer
  • Mrs. Spina bought 4 boxes of 8 pork chops. She set aside 12 and separated the rest into packs of4 to freeze. How many packs of c
    13·1 answer
  • This season, the probability that the Yankees will win a game is 0.6 and the probability that the Yankees will score 5 or more r
    14·1 answer
  • If 90 people were at a game and one-sixth bought programs for $1.50 each,
    6·1 answer
  • What is the perimeter of the<br> figure below?<br> 2 in<br> 9 in<br> 2 in
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!