There was no way to contain the diseases no vaccines poor treatment no knowledge of what it was not a strong immune system
It stands for America with disabilities act
Give benefits to the people who have disabilities
"Yick Wo v. Hopkins, 118 U.S. 356 (1886), was the first case where the United States Supreme Court ruled that a law that is race-neutral on its face, but is administered in a prejudicial manner, is an infringement of the Equal Protection Clause in the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.
Answer:
The Tea Act of 1773 was one of several measures imposed on the American colonists by the heavily indebted British government in the decade leading up to the American Revolutionary War (1775-83). The act’s main purpose was not to raise revenue from the colonies but to bail out the floundering East India Company, a key actor in the British economy. The British government granted the company a monopoly on the importation and sale of tea in the colonies. The colonists had never accepted the constitutionality of the duty on tea, and the Tea Act rekindled their opposition to it.
Explanation:
1) the Constitution, federal laws made pursuant to it, and treaties made under its authority,
2) when state constitutions or laws passed by state legislatures or the national Congress are found to conflict with the federal Constitution, they have no force.
3) Yes, all treaties are the “supreme law of the land”
4) The congress can shut down the government.
