Answer:
International trade left to its natural course without tariffs, quotas, or other restrictions.
<span>Assuming that this is referring to the same list of options that was posted before with this question, the correct response would be "both Egypt and Mesopotamia" that </span>placed valued writing, art, and fine workmanship, since these were some of the most innovative societies in human history.
how do we know if no one has ever thought of them before lol XD
Great Britain attempted to sway the United
States to support the Allies by highlighting every German atrocity
inflicted on the Allies to stir up anti-German sentiment in the United States.
The
victorious allied nations
of World War I and World War II. In World War I, theAllies included Britain, France, Italy,
Russia, and the United States. In World War II, the Allies<span> included Britain, France, the Soviet
Union, and the United States.</span>
The Supreme Court can declare laws passed by Congress (the House of Representatives and the Senate) to be unconstitutional.
More detail:
Judicial review refers to the courts' ability to review any law to see if it violates any existing law or any statute of a state constitution or the US Constitution. On the federal level, Marbury v. Madison (1803) is considered the landmark case for the Supreme Court asserting its authority of judicial review, to strike down a law as unconstitutional.
Background on the landmark case concerning the Supreme Court's power of judicial review:
It was sort of a roundabout way in which the principle of judicial review was asserted by the Supreme Court in the case of Marbury v. Madison. William Marbury had been appointed Justice of the Peace for the District of Columbia by outgoing president John Adams -- one of a number of such last-minute appointments made by Adams. When Thomas Jefferson came into office as president, he directed his Secretary of State, James Madison, not to deliver many of the commission papers for appointees such as Marbury. Marbury petitioned the Supreme Court directly to hear his case, as a provision of the Judiciary Act of 1789 had made possible. The Court said that particular provision of the Judiciary Act was in conflict with Article III of the Constitution, and so they could not issue a specific ruling in Marbury's case (which they believe he should have won). Nevertheless, in making their statement about the case, the Court established the principle of judicial review.
