This is what I put for my thesis, please word it in your own words but it should give you an overall idea of what I basically wrote.
The conflicts in Xinjiang from the 1940s and early 50s, the conflicts in Chechnya in the 1990s, and the conflicts in Quebec in the 1970s are all alike in who or what the conflict revolves around but are different in the way the people are treated. They’re also alike in what happened to the countries but different in the way that the people reacted to what was going on.
The common of the three would be the language. These three ethnic groups had struggled regarding language. They did not use the language that is being used by the dominant groups. However, they differ in terms on how they cope with the changes. For the Xianjing, violence occurred because the Uighur were forced to assimilate with the Chinese during the Han dynasty. They tried to fight it at first, but they were outnumbered. Quebec had allowed the French to be their official language to avoid bigger conflict between their colonizers. While Chechnya had been the most violent one. The Chechens had waged war against the Russians. At first, they were able to win, however they had lose during the second war when the Russians were able to control Chechnya.
Containing a negative consequence for the stability of the social system. The view of society as a set of interrelated parts that work together to produce a stable social system.
